Skip to main content

China’s continued detention of the two Michaels can be seen as a distraction, or a wakeup call.

For some in this country’s business community, Canada’s arrest of Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou in response to a United States extradition request, and China’s seizing Canadians Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor, is all just a big misunderstanding. In that telling of the story, Canada has been unfortunately diverted off the path of ever-greater trade, rising opportunities for Canadian businesses there, growing Chinese investment here and an ever-closer relationship.

And to restore the relationship, and remove the distractions, all Canada has to do is accede to Beijing’s demands. Releasing Ms. Meng is like hitting the reset button.

Story continues below advertisement

But for others, this page included, the chill of the past two years is not a misunderstanding. It is a moment of clarity, provided by the other side’s brutal honesty. With the Beijing government showing its true colours, it’s an opportunity for Canadians, and the Trudeau government, to understand what the People’s Republic of China is, and to recognize that Canada’s relationship with China was never what was pretended, and could never be what was imagined.

The tension between Canada and China, and between Europe and the United States and China, does not have to be the beginning of a new Cold War. But the surest way to avoid one is to recognize that the nature and behaviour of the Beijing regime make it a possibility.

China is not the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was also a non-democratic superpower, but it headed a parallel, separate economic system. Its elite were not sending their kids to Harvard and Oxford and the University of Toronto, or investing in real estate from Vancouver to London. It barely traded with countries outside the Soviet bloc. Global supply chains for computers and cars did not run through Moscow and Leningrad.

Since the late 1970s, China has followed a different path. Instead of aiming for an economic system cut off from what was once called “the first world,” it has tried to enmesh itself as deeply as possible into established systems of trade, research and production.

As a result, China has quickly gone from backwater to superpower. It will soon become the largest economy in the world, surpassing the U.S.

However, there is no sign of the Communist Party of China loosening its grip; on the contrary, its actions at home and in Hong Kong show it less tolerant than ever of dissent. Democracy, which it once hinted was a goal to work toward, is now condemned as foreign heresy. Ditto the rule of law. Overseas, China has upped its ambitions, its bellicosity and its willingness to throw around its weight, as in the hostage-taking of the two Michaels.

The power and influence of China is a global fact, and a growing one. It cannot be wished away, nor can the regime be wished into change.

Story continues below advertisement

The challenge for Canada is coming up with an approach toward Beijing that is based on respect for its power, but also respect for our own values and national interests. In the long run, the best protection of Canada’s interests will be power. Given that Canada’s size and weight are dwarfed by China, that means a need for allies.

That’s why, when the Trudeau government in its early days proposed to pursue a free-trade agreement with China, we were opposed. Backers who hoped to “get into” the Chinese market before other Western countries were playing into China’s hands. We should be partnering with our allies, not trying to undercut them.

In any case, China’s desire for such an agreement was most likely not about trade, but about preventing Canada from restricting investment by its state-owned companies. Trade between Canada and China is already largely free, at least for imports into this country, thanks to the World Trade Organization. The WTO isn’t a perfect agreement, but it is at least a multilateral forum. It’s a table with more than two chairs, the traditional preferred venue of Canadian foreign policy.

More than 70 years ago, faced with a different sort of threat, Canada helped to create NATO. China is not the Soviet Union and the threat this time is largely not military. But there is a need today for many players to come together, as there was three generations ago, to make themselves big enough earn the respect of a superpower.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies