Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Minister of International Co-operation Bev Oda pauses as she responds to a question during Question Period in the House Commons on Feb. 14, 2011.

Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press

The departure of Bev Oda from the federal cabinet should have happened months ago. Nevertheless, her resignation - effective July 31, apparently prompted by the knowledge or belief that she would be shuffled out later this summer - is a much-needed signal that Prime Miniter Stephen Harper holds his ministers accountable.

Over the past couple of years, that has too often been called into question. It is debatable whether various spending or ethics controversies should have cost the jobs of senior cabinet members such as Treasury Board President Tony Clement, Defence Minister Peter MacKay, or Industry Minister Christian Paradis. But taken as a whole, the government's steadfast defence of even the most questionable behaviour has risked projecting a sense of entitlement.

Ms. Oda, the Minister responsible for Canada's international development agency, at least publicly apologized this spring when it emerged that she had upgraded herself from a perfectly good hotel to a much more expensive luxury one while attending a conference in London, England. But that was only the most recent instance in which she had exhibited dubious judgment. In 2006, during the very first months of Mr. Harper's government, she found herself in hot water for spending more than $5,000 on limousines while attending the Juno Awards. And last year, she was reprimanded by the Speaker of the House of Commons for misleading Parliament over the doctoring of a memo.

Story continues below advertisement

The latest brush with scandal was not just a misstep; it was a sign that Ms. Oda was either incapable of learning from her mistakes, or did not believe she needed to do so. The latter was a particularly troubling prospect, and required action on Mr. Harper's part. While loyalty is an admirable trait, and ministers should not be tossed overboard at the first hint of trouble, neither should they be given the impression that they're untouchable.

Mr. Harper is certainly not the first Prime Minister to stand by some of his ministers too long. But it bears recalling that his Conservatives were first elected, in large part, because they promised greater accountability and transparency than the Liberals had offered. Ms. Oda's exit, however overdue, is a small but encouraging indication that Mr. Harper remembers that.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies