Skip to main content

Computer generated email screen showing excessive spam detail with pointer.

iStockphoto

The magnificent convenience of electronic communication should not be ruined by the nuisance known as "spam": the indiscriminate bombardment of people's e-mail inboxes. But the well-intentioned act of Parliament commonly known as Canada's anti-spam law overreaches in more than one way, unduly weighing down electronic commerce, and potentially affecting many Canadian companies – including The Globe and Mail, in its interactions with readers.

CASL became law in late 2010, and will probably come into force this year, but its regulations – which could add some welcome flexibility – have not been definitively settled.

The core of the act is a prohibition against sending a commercial electronic message, unless the addressee has already agreed to receive it – either explicitly, in writing, or implicitly. The act limits that implied consent; by far the most common form it could take would be "an existing business relationship," such as a continuing contract.

Story continues below advertisement

In the Internet age, that is a very narrow criterion. Large numbers of people may frequently visit a website without having a contract – such as a paid subscription. In order to do business in the 21st century, companies legitimately want and need to engage and communicate back and forth with their customers and their potential customers.

Acts of the U.S. Congress are often more drastic than their staid Canadian equivalents. CASL is an exception. Where the U.S. anti-spam law enables consumers to opt out of getting a company's message, the coming Canadian regime requires companies to send people a request for permission to send them e-mails. And the companies won't be allowed to ask that consent by e-mail; presumably, they will have to resort to the post office.

Moreover, the penalties can be huge: up to $1-million for an individual, and up to $10-million for a corporation – seemingly for each violation. All this adds to the already heavy regulatory burden on Canadian companies, putting them at a disadvantage to foreign spammers, the real culprits – who are untouched by CASL.

So far, the government's draft regulations offer little or no relief from this draconian scheme. The apparent hesitation to proclaim CASL in force may be encouraging. The Canadian economy would benefit from a more balanced, accommodating approach to the commerce of the future.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter