Skip to main content

Workers construct the pipeline in Jasper National Park, AB as part of the Anchor Loop Project in 2007/08.

Hand-out/KINDER MORGAN CANADA

There is a strong case to be made that Adrian Dix, the British Columbia NDP Leader, forfeited his wide lead in the provincial election last spring thanks to his outright rejection of the proposed expansion of Kinder Morgan Inc.'s Trans Mountain pipeline. The moral of the story is not that the voters of B.C. are overwhelmingly in favour of the project, but rather that they wanted to remain open-minded. Quite rightly, they did not want to prejudge.

Kinder Morgan has now filed its application, and it is up to the National Energy Board to balance economic opportunity with serious environmental concerns.

With oil and gas production in Western Canada rapidly expanding, and with this country's long-time customer, the United States, approaching something like energy self-sufficiency, a large and growing volume of energy must be exported overseas. There is nowhere else for these petroleum products to go. At the same time, the highest environmental standards must be applied.

Story continues below advertisement

The expanded Trans Mountain pipeline would use an existing route, in contrast to the more controversial Northern Gateway project in northern in B.C., but it would terminate in the highly populated Lower Mainland, at Burnaby. The number of tankers passing through Burrard Inlet to the Pacific would rise from about five a month to about one a day.

The first principle to be respected? Polluter pays. Earlier this month, the Tanker Safety Expert Panel submitted its report to the federal government on oil-spill response. The panel endorses the polluter-pay principle; it says that the maximum present charge to the polluter, a mere $161-million, should be abolished, and Canadian taxpayers should not be on the hook at all. Lisa Raitt, the Minister of Transport, received the report favourably, and so did Joe Oliver, the Minister of Natural Resources.

The NEB is accountable to Parliament through the minister of natural resources. On the Northern Gateway project, Mr. Oliver sometimes sounded more like an advocate than a regulator. It would be wise if ministers in the Harper government were to keep quiet. The Canadian government regulates pipelines; it doesn't build them. There must be an independent review, and the appearance of independence, too.

On the whole, the transport of energy by pipeline is better than by railway or trucks, but the NEB has the duty to balance and, if possible, reconcile Canada's oil economy with Canada's environment. Memo to Ottawa: Let it do its job.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies