Skip to main content

Transport Minister Lisa Raitt answers a question during Question Period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Wednesday Oct 29, 2014 . THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld

THE CANADIAN PRESS

Nearly 16 months after a train derailment in Lac-Mégantic, Quebec, killed 47 people, the federal government is finally implementing the kinds of regulations and inspections that could have prevented the disaster. The changes announced by Transport Minister Lisa Raitt will feel like too little, too late to the people of Lac-Mégantic, but they will improve rail safety in Canada and are the right steps.

The tragedy of July 6, 2013, happened because a train pulling 72 cars of unusually volatile crude oil in inadequately designed tankers was left unattended on a sloping main line without enough handbrakes set and without any backup precautions in place. The lead engine was in poor mechanical condition. And the now-defunct short-line hauler operating the train was in financial difficulty and had been allowed by Transport Canada to operate with a single crew member.

Transport Canada made some important changes in the immediate wake of the disaster, including stricter requirements for securing unattended trains and putting at least two crew members on trains hauling dangerous goods. In the months that followed, as fears grew about the increased use of rail to ship crude, Ottawa pulled the least crash-resistant tank cars from service and made sure the industry was doing proper route planning.

Story continues below advertisement

And now Ms. Raitt has introduced regulations that lay out the number of handbrakes that must be set and inspected on every unattended train. The number will depend on the slope of the tracks and the weight of the train cars. As well, air brake systems powered by the locomotives must be verified and fully charged, and at least one backup measure must be used.

Ottawa is also hiring inspectors to carry out more safety audits and is undertaking a blitz audit of the training practices of short-haul carriers. Finally, it plans to study the properties of various crude oils and to make sure rail shipments are properly classified when dangerous goods are being moved.

A larger issue for the federal government is the fact that the rail industry wants to ship an increasing amount of crude oil – a business opportunity created by an inadequate pipeline supply. But crude-by-rail carries risks. It's good to see that Ottawa is determined to minimize that risk in a convincing way.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies