Skip to main content

U.S. President Donald Trump has been on a roll lately. Over the course of a few days, he endorsed a politician accused of sexual misconduct involving teenage girls, made a silly attack on the media and cluelessly insulted people who went to the White House expecting to be honoured by him.

A year ago, or even a month ago, these standard bits of repertoire from Mr. Trump's vaudevillian presidency would have sent his critics into a tailspin. But that isn't happening to the same degree this time.

Instead, Mr. Trump's most recent outrages somehow seem rather humdrum. Have we become bored with the predictability of the President's antics, so numbed by their sheer number that what used to shock us now only produces a minor tickle? Or are we finally on to him.

Story continues below advertisement

On Sunday, Mr. Trump reiterated his endorsement of Republican senate candidate Roy Moore, even as credible accusations of sexual impropriety against the former Alabama judge were piling up, and the Republican Party was withdrawing its support and funding for Mr. Moore's campaign.

On Monday, Mr. Trump tweeted, for no apparent reason, "We should have a contest as to which of the Networks, plus CNN and not including Fox, is the most dishonest, corrupt and/or distorted in its political coverage of your favourite President (me). They are all bad. Winner to receive the FAKE NEWS TROPHY!"

The tweet felt more tired than outlandish, like the stale material of a bad comic. The same day, Mr. Trump joked during a speech honouring native American war veterans that his nickname for Senator Elizabeth Warren is "Pocahontas," an insensitive remark that left the honorees feeling insulted, and Mr. Trump puzzled about what the problem was.

All of these were outrageous acts unworthy of the President of the United States. Opponents and pundits roundly and rightly criticized him. But on the whole it just didn't feel like a calamity. The world moved on.

Mr. Trump may well be on his way to becoming a new kind of lame-duck president. It's not that his term is coming to an end, which is the normal definition of a lame duck. It's that his schtick has worn off, and once that's gone all that is left is a below-average president in terms of political effectiveness, intelligence, credibility and approval ratings.

If this President loses his power to shock, then he has lost all of his power.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter