Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Globe editorial: Politicians are wrong to block people on social media

Should politicians block citizens they don't happen to agree with, or who are clearly partisan, from following them on social media such as Twitter and Facebook?

That's a question being asked in Canada and the United States. The answer is simple: No.

In the U.S., the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University has filed suit on behalf of people who've been blocked from following Donald Trump's personal Twitter account.

Story continues below advertisement

The President uses @realDonaldTrump to announce government policy, such as the tweet in late July in which he said that he was reinstating the ban on transgender people serving in the military.

The suit argues that Mr. Trump's feed is "a public forum under the First Amendment" and that the President can't prevent people from seeing it just because they criticize him.

In Canada, the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association says it is examining complaints from people who have been banned from the Facebook or Twitter feeds of MPs and cabinet ministers, or whose comments have been deleted from those feeds.

When it comes to cabinet ministers, that should never happen. Any work-related social media platform used by a minister should by default be considered a public forum, not a personal one. If someone posts a critical comment, they shouldn't be censored.

The tougher question is whether or not the work-related social media accounts of regular MPs can be held to the same standard, since they don't represent government.

Beyond the legality of it, though, lies the fact that our politicians should make a visible display of respecting the right of Canadians to disagree with them, especially in these hyper-partisan times.

No MP, or even a cabinet minister, will be criticized for blocking anyone who posts hateful messages or engages in harassment.

Story continues below advertisement

But barring that, it's wrong for elected officials to choose which Canadians can see what they think, and which ones can't.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading…

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.