Skip to main content

Editorials Globe Editorial: Prime Minister needed to say more in speech to caucus

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper points to the door as he speaks to members of Caucus on Parliament Hill Tuesday May 21, 2013 in Ottawa.

Adrian Wyld/CP

Prime Minister Stephen Harper addressed his caucus today in an effort to control the ever-deepening Senate controversy. He used the opportunity to score some political points, but he needed to say more.

What Canadians wanted to hear from the Prime Minister was a confirmation that senators who file invalid expense claims should repay the money themselves and not be bailed out by high-ranking members of the Prime Minister's Office. Mr. Harper said he was "not happy" about the secret arrangement involving Senator Mike Duffy and Nigel Wright, his former chief of staff, but he did not address the many unanswered questions surrounding it. Why was Senator Duffy bailed out? Who else was involved? Did it violate rules governing parliamentarians' conduct?

Instead of addressing these critical questions, Mr. Harper praised his government's efforts to increase accountability and invited any person who would use public office for personal gain to "leave this room." He also attempted to refocus his caucus on Senate reform. Senate reform is a legitimate issue – Canada needs a strong upper house with unimpeachable legitimacy that can perform its critical role of representing regional interests – but not really the one at hand.

Story continues below advertisement

The public is less interested at this moment in setting Senate term limits than it is in hearing a prime minister whose mantra is accountability explain why his chief of staff repaid Senator Duffy's invalidated expenses. For Mr. Harper to ignore the public's outrage over the $90,000 payment is regrettable.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter