Skip to main content

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau demonstrated the right reflexes when asked on Thursday about Quebec's desire to reopen the Constitution. "We are not reopening the Constitution," he said.

We will grant that it wasn't the most polite response. After all, it was only afterward that Quebec Premier Philippe Couillard released a 200-page document, entitled "Being Québécois: It's our way of being Canadians," that he hopes will resurface the "taboo" subject of constitutional negotiations in a kinder, gentler way.

He insists that there is no ultimatum involved, or even a schedule. And the document shows a real openness to diversity, while reinforcing Quebec's French fact. "It seems to me that the least [Mr. Trudeau] could do is read the document," Mr. Couillard said.

Story continues below advertisement

Ottawa will no doubt read it. It has no choice, ultimatum or not. But Mr. Couillard is being disingenuous about where it will all lead.

He himself says the "ultimate goal" is to get the provincial government's signature on the Constitution. And his document makes the same demands that Quebec made in 1986: recognition as a distinct society, limits on federal spending power, guaranteed representation on the Supreme Court, a constitutional veto and increased control over immigration.

In other words, everything is on the table. We know what that means: Once the Constitution is opened up, the other provinces and Indigenous leaders will want to have a peek inside, too. On Thursday, Brad Wall of Saskatchewan was the first ROC premier to say that, if Quebec wants to renegotiate the constitution, his province has its own demands.

The opportunity to relive Meech Lake and the Charlottetown Accord is not welcome at all. And, in practical terms regarding Quebec, completely unnecessary. Quebec has three legislated seats on the Supreme Court, and more control over immigration than any other province. Separation is at a record low ebb. If not exactly thrilled about it, Quebec has grown comfortable being distinct without having it set in constitutional stone.

And in any case, there is no need to negotiate Quebec "back in" to the Constitution, since it is not currently "out."

There was no good reason to open this can of worms. It could be too late, though. Mr. Couillard has revived a lingering Quebec grievance. Ignoring it may well only make it more sharply felt. Here we go again?

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies