Skip to main content

Editorials Globe editorial: Taking the ‘hi’ out of ‘bonjour-hi’ won’t save the French language

Political manna can assume many guises.

The sovereigntist Parti Québécois's inexorable downward spiral is amply documented by polls, but a single census data point has brought it the opportunity to bust out a go-to move: performative stoking of language anxiety on the backs of les anglais.

That's right – the scourge that is the universal Montreal retail-industry greeting of "bonjour-hi" must be killed with fire, its ashes buried in lye and the location forgotten.

Story continues below advertisement

Perfect. Which foul colloquialism shall be suivant-next?

The impetus for this four-ring circus of inanity is a Statistics Canada finding on the proportion of primarily French-speaking workplaces in Quebec, which dropped from slightly above to just below 80 per cent from 2006 to 2016.

The decline is largely a Montreal phenomenon. It is also accompanied by a similar increase in the use of French in multilingual workplaces.

Thus, the statistics can be read as proof of dangerous slippage; or, more benignly, as Quebec companies looking outward to English-speaking clientele amid a tightening embrace of French by anglophones and allophones.

Three guesses as to which interpretation rapidly submerging PQ Leader Jean-François Lisée has grabbed onto.

So, the inevitable: a unanimous, PQ-sponsored National Assembly resolution calling on shops to stick with "bonjour" and cut out the nasty English bit.

There are valid and important reasons behind Quebec's commitment to safeguard the French language.

Story continues below advertisement

Using political street theatre to stigmatize public utterances of English in a cosmopolitan, internationally celebrated city, however, is unserious and of highly dubious value.

Meaningfully protecting French requires tackling actual challenges, such as getting immigrants to live and work in French, and nurturing the cultural attachments of children who have access to limitless and borderless choices in music, literature, television and film.

That's hard, complicated work, and the PQ has a history of failing at it.

Also, it takes a while to show up in the polling.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter