Skip to main content

Helena Guergis arrives to appear as a witness at a at commons status of women committee meeting on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Monday March 15, 2010.

Sean Kilpatrick/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Now that the cloud of a possible criminal investigation by the RCMP has finally been lifted, Helena Guergis should be given the opportunity to salvage what she can of a political career in tatters from innuendo and association.

It will be a daunting challenge for Ms. Guergis to recover politically from the damage that has been done after the Prime Minister's Office called in the RCMP and the Ethics Commissioner over what it said publicly were "credible and serious allegations." But Prime Minister Stephen Harper can assist Ms. Guergis in that process by permitting her to rejoin caucus, and by removing the punitive ban on her ability to stand as a Conservative candidate.

Even in light of the RCMP letter informing Ms. Guergis she has been cleared of all allegations of criminal wrongdoing, the Prime Minister acted appropriately in reporting possible wrongdoing to the authorities. It is also correct that Ms. Guergis should not have remained in cabinet (she filled a junior role as minister of state for the status of women) in the circumstances.

Story continues below advertisement

However, the manner in which Mr. Harper simultaneously expelled Ms. Guergis from caucus, and then later ordered that she not be permitted to stand again for the Conservative Party as a candidate, is at odds with the treatment of other Conservative politicians facing allegations.

The federal Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner has twice turned down requests that Ms. Guergis be investigated. Mary Dawson is, however, investigating the conduct of Natural Resources Minister Christian Paradis over allegations he may have used his position to advance a business proposal from Ms. Guergis's husband, the former Tory MP Rahim Jaffer. The contrast with Ms. Guergis' harsh treatment is striking. Mr. Paradis remains both in caucus and in cabinet. There is no ban on his future candidacy.

Mr. Jaffer is undoubtedly a figure from whom the Conservatives would now like some distance (although he, too, is no longer the subject of an RCMP investigation, according to his lawyer). The fact that he is married to Ms. Guergis may be embarrassing for some in the party.

An inconvenient husband, however, should not be a bar to political service. With the RCMP investigation over, Ms. Guergis should have the right to sit in the Conservative caucus, and stand again for her party's nomination in the next federal election. But given her treatment, it would be hard to blame her if, in the event such an offer was made, she said, "No thanks."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies