Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Support quality journalism
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
The Globe and Mail
Support quality journalism
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Globe and Mail website displayed on various devices
Just$1.99
per week
for the first 24 weeks

var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){console.log("scroll");var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1);

Quebec Premier Pauline Marois respond to Opposition questions as the legislature resumes for its fall session Tuesday, September 17, 2013 at the legislature in Quebec City. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jacques Boissinot

Jacques Boissinot/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Comparing the Parti Québécois government's looming Charter of Quebec Values to the province's 36-year-old Charter of the French Language, as Premier Pauline Marois and her party have loudly been doing of late, is at best fraught and at worst odious. No one should be fooled by this tactic.

Mme. Marois has said that the values charter will be "a strong unifying element for Quebeckers, the way it was with Bill 101." The PQ, meanwhile, has posted on its website a quiz that compares the headlines generated by the tabling and passage of Bill 101 in 1977 to reaction to the Charter of Values. Did a Washington newspaper call a proposed Quebec charter an "oppressive measure" in 1977 or 2013? When was it that a federalist politician claimed a proposed charter would create a "Quebec ghetto"?

It doesn't matter. We get the implications: that the negative reception for the values charter is proof of its virtue; and that those who gainsay today will be proven wrong by history tomorrow.

Story continues below advertisement

This is ridiculous. The language charter, while contentious, addressed a specific, documented problem – the decline of the French language and the unfair predominance of English in business. As well, it applied equally across the entire population: The French majority were as restricted as the province's minority populations in their language choices. Time and court challenges have smoothed out the language law's rougher edges. Few people now argue that it needs to be repealed.

The values charter, on the other hand, is without justification. No one in government has credibly demonstrated the existence of a social ill involving provincial employees wearing conspicuous religious symbols. The new charter corrects nothing, and it unfairly targets a small minority of people of various faiths while leaving unperturbed the province's mostly non-religious majority.

The only things Bill 101 and the proposed new law share are the word "charter" and the PQ's vast capacity for fomenting cultural tension. And that is the most worrisome part of watching the leaders of the modern PQ ride the coattails of the Charter of the French Language: Unable to form a winning argument in favour of their movement, they are chipping away at the hard-won social cohesion their predecessors built, and waiting to see where it leads.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies