Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

NeatFreak managing partner John Collins poses with his Blackberry in Mississauga, January 24, 2013.

J.P. Moczulski/The Globe and Mail

The federal Competition Bureau is weighing in on Canadians' ongoing love-hate affair with cellphone carriers, saying, among other things, that carriers shouldn't advertise "unlimited" data plans that are actually quite limited, and should stop locking smartphones to prevent them from working on competing networks. These are good recommendations that fall within the mandate of the Competition commissioner, but they are not the real answer to consumers' frustrations. Someone needs to remind Canadian cellphone owners that they have a lot more control of their fates than they think; it's time for them to stop turning to the government for help and start flexing their collective muscle.

Canadians love their cellphones. Close to 85 per cent of the population was subscribed to a carrier in the fourth quarter of 2011, according to IAB Canada, which represents the digital marketing and advertising industry. Of that 85 per cent, it is safe to say that 100 per cent has griped at some point about poor service, lengthy contracts, prohibitive cancellation fees and other frustrations. Yet we keep signing three-year contracts with service providers, then turn to Ottawa for relief when we want out of those contracts.

Ottawa obviously does have a role to play. The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) is developing a code of conduct for wireless carriers; the Competition Bureau has proposed to the CRTC that it prohibit false claims about "unlimited" data and ban the locking of smartphones, thereby making it possible for consumers to switch carriers and benefit from competition. It also wants contract termination fees to be minimized and made more manageable for consumers.

Story continues below advertisement

But the Competition Bureau quite pointedly does not call for a limit on the length of cellphone contracts. It points out that contracts of longer than two years are illegal in Europe, and that in the United States most contracts top out at two years. But the bureau does not say there should be any imposed limit in Canada.

Perhaps that is because Canadian consumers have been told over and over again that they can save money by the paying full price for an unlocked phone, shop around for the best service deal, and never lock into a contract. Instead they happily choose to amortize the cost of a phone over the life of a three-year contract, because they don't want to, or believe they can't afford to, pay $600 or more up front for a phone they can own.

This is an economic choice. No one has to sign a contract. The simple act of making the smarter economic decision by saving up your money and paying full price for a phone, which would eliminate the headache of contracts and save money in the long run, would put pressure on providers to lower the length of contracts. Canadian cellphone users have the power to get the deals they want. They're just not choosing to use it.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies