Skip to main content

Liberal leader Justin Trudeau speaks at the opening of the Liberal caucus in Georgetown, P.E.I. on Wednesday, Aug. 28, 2013.

Nathan Rochford/THE CANADIAN PRESS

The Quebec Charter of Values threatens to radically reshape the character of the province, but this is also a fulcrum moment for Canada as a whole.

So it's time for politicians from all three major federal parties to show leadership in opposing it, condemning the charter as the discriminatory document that it is, and acknowledging the far-reaching implications it would have in Quebec and beyond its borders.

Justin Trudeau, the Liberal Leader, should be praised for showing prompt leadership in opposing the proposal, in both English and French. His impassioned call for Quebecers and Canadians to rise above "divisive identity politics" was inspiring. "We are going to fight against this charter, which does not represent the openness of spirit of Quebeckers," he said.

Story continues below advertisement

And Thomas Mulcair, the NDP Leader, rightly described the proposal as "state-mandated discrimination."

Admittedly, the stakes are higher for the Harper government to criticize the proposal, balanced against its need to manage its relationship with Quebec.

To his credit, however, Jason Kenney, the Minister of Employment and Multiculturalism, vowed to rigorously defend the constitutional rights of those Quebeckers whose freedom of religion would be threatened by the Charter of Values. Even the Bloc Québécois has asked for more time to consider its response, astonishingly distancing itself from the PQ.

Ottawa's united response is heartening, because it lifts the debate into the national sphere. After all, the proposed Charter of Values is not just an affront to ethnic minorities in Quebec. It should offend every Canadian who believes in the multicultural values of our country.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter