Skip to main content

Ontario Energy Minister Chris Bentley.

Moe Doiron/The Globe and Mail

The government of Ontario should not struggle on, to uphold the preference for provincial suppliers in its ambitious Green Energy program, now that the World Trade Organization has decided that the program's "local content" element violates international trade law.

Chris Bentley, the provincial Minister of Energy, had already said that Ontario would work with the federal government on an appeal, if the WTO made such a decision – which was likely enough to happen.

The customer for the renewable energy in question is an electricity utility owned by the Crown in right of Ontario. So, as a matter of government procurement, the Green Energy program is subject to the rules and principles of the WTO – indeed to rules going back to the postwar GATT, the WTO's predecessor.

Story continues below advertisement

As Lawrence Herman, an international trade lawyer at Cassels Brock Blackwell LLP, says, "If it looks and walks like a local trade preference, however noble and just the cause, it can't pass muster."

For Canada (on behalf of Ontario) to persist in opposing the lawsuit brought by the European Union and Japan, with a supporting brief from the United States – or to provoke retaliatory measures from Europe by simply disregarding the ruling – would be especially odd at present, considering that Canada and the EU plan to put the finishing touches soon on their free trade agreement.

It is to be hoped and expected that the Canada-EU Comprehensive and Economic Trade Agreement will include provisions that eliminate discriminatory procurement policies at all levels of government.

Canada should not waste time on an appeal. Instead, the Legislative Assembly of Ontario (now unfortunately prorogued) should repeal the local-content aspects of the Green Energy and Green Economy Act. There is quite enough in the rest of that statute to satisfy the departing Premier, Dalton McGuinty, that he will leave a legacy that accelerates the growth of renewable energy.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter