Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Missing Women Inquiry Commissioner Wally Oppal.

BEN NELMS/Reuters

Wally Oppal says the scores of women missing and presumed murdered by Robert Pickton and others in the Vancouver area were doubly forsaken – by society and by police. In fact, they were triply forsaken, though Mr. Oppal's terms of reference did not allow him to say so. The law itself forsook many of them, by criminalizing them for selling sex and driving them to the extreme margins.

The long-term value of Mr. Oppal's report, even apart from its many useful recommendations, may be in indirectly demolishing the federal government's case for maintaining prostitution laws as they are. A challenge to those laws is currently before the Supreme Court of Canada. The evidence of marginalization and vulnerability compiled in the 1,448 pages of Mr. Oppal's inquiry report is beyond doubt. By worsening the dangers, the criminal law is, in effect, a help to serial killers such as Mr. Pickton.

Robert Pickton was in plain sight, but the prostitutes were invisible; the criminalizing of bawdy houses (along with the criminalizing of street solicitation, an element of the law we support) and the illegality of hiring a bodyguard left them physically at risk and with little ability to call on police protection. "I cannot ignore the reality that this legal regime played an important role in shaping the relationship between the police and women in the [Downtown Eastside], potentially affecting the police investigations into the women's disappearances," Mr. Oppal writes.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Oppal is a former appeal court judge and a former British Columbia attorney general; he sets out convincingly how laws and policing work, or fail to work. One woman, known in the report as "Ms. Anderson," did not disappear; she survived a knife attack, and reported it to police. This was in 1997, and the RCMP believed her completely, though their investigation was clumsy – an officer interviewed her just once, and didn't follow up leads suggesting that Mr. Pickton had attacked others. A charge of attempted murder was laid, but Crown attorney Randi Connor stayed the charge, finding that Ms. Anderson, because of her drug addictions, was a shaky witness. But as Mr. Oppal documents, Ms. Connor interviewed her only once, found her incoherent and nodding off and didn't offer to get her help for her addictions. Nineteen more women are believed to have been murdered before Mr. Pickton was finally arrested in 2002.

The Oppal report is a hair-raising examination of how marginalization undermines equality before the law, including the right to the law's protection. The report is a death knell for prostitution laws in their current form.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies