Ottawa beats a retreat on veterans’ rights

Minister of Veterans Affairs Julian Fantino responds to asks a question during question period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday, November 18, 2014. Veterans Affairs is embarking Wednesday on an effort to rebuild bridges with groups that represent disgruntled ex-soldiers, but it is excluding some organizations that have threatened to campaign against the governing Conservatives. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick

Sean Kilpatrick/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Published November 25, 2014 Updated May 12, 2018

Published November 25, 2014

This article was published more than 5 years ago. Some information in it may no longer be current.

The Harper government's religious conversion on the veterans' affairs file continues apace.

To wit, the government agrees with every recommendation the Auditor-General has made regarding the improvement of mental-health services to veterans, most of which have to do with speeding up and streamlining the application process for benefits. As well, Ottawa announced this week it will spend $200-million on mental-health services and facilities for veterans and personnel, and another $5-million on research into the mental health of Canadian Forces members.

The emphasis on mental health has grown out of the tragic suicides of 160 servicemen and women between 2004 and 2014. It is also the result of society's greater awareness of mental illnesses, particularly post-traumatic stress disorder, which afflicts so many personnel and veterans, especially those who fought in Afghanistan. The government, prodded by the Auditor-General, is taking the right steps to address a terrible problem.

Story continues below advertisement

But this shouldn't distract from the government's multiple confrontations with veterans over the past eight years. Those include lump-sum disability payments for wounded modern-era vets that Veterans Ombudsman Guy Parent says are inadequate and will leave hundreds in poverty when they reach 65; accusations of discharging wounded personnel just months before they become eligible for a pension, in order to save money; and a nasty videotaped exchange beween Veterans Affairs Minister Julian Fantino and a group of veterans who went to Parliament to meet with him.

The lowest point came in 2013 when government lawyers argued in court that Ottawa has no particular moral obligation to veterans. In an effort to cut costs, the Harper government was willing to depreciate a sacred duty. Now, faced with outrage from injured and suffering Afghan war vets, it has suddenly seen the light regarding mental-health issues. Good. But no one should mistake this for salvation. There's still more the government can and should be doing for wounded vets.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Subscribe to comment Why do I need to subscribe?