Skip to main content

Flowers can be seen tied to a pole on Dundas St., at Grace St., where 18-year-old Sammy Yatim was shot by Toronto Police, Toronto July 29, 2013. Photo by: Fernando Morales/The Globe and Mail.

Fernando Morales/The Globe and Mail

The investigators looking into the shooting of Sammy Yatim early last Saturday morning should focus on two things: the high number of shots fired by one officer; and whether or not the police could have retreated and allowed an agitated 18-year-old boy time to calm down and take himself out of harm's way. Either a convincing case must be made that lethal force was the only option, or action must be taken against the officers involved. A good degree of public confidence in the Toronto police hangs in the balance.

At this point, the public knows only what has been revealed by videos posted on the Internet or released to the media. In one video, Mr. Yatim can be seen at the front of an otherwise empty streetcar brandishing what appears to be a knife. The front doors to the streetcar are open, and two police officers are aiming their handguns at Mr. Yatim and yelling at him to "drop the knife." Mr. Yatim retreats into the streetcar. Then he quickly moves back toward the doors. An officer fires three quick shots into the doorway. Thanks to a new video made public on Tuesday, we now know that those shots felled Mr. Yatim. The officer who fired the three shots pauses, then fires another six rounds in a more deliberate fashion, as Mr. Yatim lies crumpled on the floor of the streetcar.

The SIU has confirmed that Mr. Yatim suffered multiple gunshot wounds, and that he was tasered after all the shots were fired. The public has learned that Mr. Yatim was a teenager born in Syria who emigrated to Canada with his family. His friends wonder why he was alone that night and so far away from his home across the city. They worry that he was lost and somehow disoriented. They cannot understand why he pulled a knife, exposed himself and ordered the passengers and driver off the streetcar, as witnesses have said. And even if that is true, they can't understand why he had to die for it.

Story continues below advertisement

Could the police have shut the streetcar's doors from the outside and waited for Mr. Yatim to calm down? Could they have backed away and established a safe perimeter while trying to de-escalate the situation? And why nine shots? Statistics show that the entire Toronto police force discharges their weapons a total of 20 to 30 times a year; nine from one officer against one suspect is very unusual. Previous SIU investigations into police shootings show that the more typical number fired is two or three.

These are the questions people want answered. They have a right to a transparent investigation, the conclusions of which don't jar with what they have seen with their own eyes.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading…

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.