Skip to main content

The death of celebrated Inuit artist Annie Pootoogook, found dead in the Rideau River last month, is being treated by the Ottawa police major-crimes unit as suspicious.

But one Ottawa police officer apparently regarded the investigation into the 47-year-old native woman's death as a waste of time.

A commenter on the Ottawa Citizen's website, who has been identified as a sergeant in the city's police force, declared that the death was "not a murder case." His logic in reaching this dismissive conclusion? "Typically many aboriginals have very short lifespans, talent or not."

Story continues below advertisement

It's hard to see why anyone would rely on that kind of twisted reasoning to discourage a murder investigation – in reality, the evidence of a premature death should point the other way. The same commenter offered a follow-up thought that indigenous Canadians are "just satisfied being alcohol or drug abusers."

The idea that even a single member of a major urban police force could prejudge a sensitive case with such closed-minded generalizations is deeply disturbing. Ottawa police chief Charles Bordeleau has labelled the comments as "inappropriate" and stated that they don't reflect the values of his force.

And yet what's worrying is that they do in fact reflect the values of a part of his force, however small. The officer in question, apparently unaware or unconcerned that he was saying something shameful, had enough confidence to share his convictions with a wider public – and he remains on active duty with the force. What kind of message does this send to a public deeply concerned about the ability of Canada's police services to investigate the deaths of indigenous women without a bias that is implicitly racist?

Too many native deaths and disappearances were ignored and trivialized for too long in Canada because of a blame-the-victim prejudice. Biased police officers can't be trusted to do their work properly – it's as simple as that. If you choose to ignore the specifics of the case in front of you because you're blinded by irrelevant preconceptions, you're simply not qualified for the job of policing.

The greater problem is that ideas like this continue to exist in police departments. Standards of recruitment and training must be improved. Bias of any kind compromises police work and does irreparable harm to the society it purports to serve.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter