Skip to main content

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry delivers a statement on the Iran talks deal at the Vienna International Center in Vienna, Austria Tuesday July 14, 2015. World powers and Iran struck a landmark deal Tuesday to curb Iran's nuclear program in exchange for billions of dollars in relief from international sanctions. (AP Photo/Ronald Zak)

Ronald Zak/AP

A tradeoff, of one kind or another, is the result of a satisfactory negotiation. By that standard, the United States and five other major powers have been quite successful in their long-drawn-out, sometimes agonizing talks with Iran on that country's nuclear ambitions.

The West got much of what it wanted. But so did the Iranian regime. Iran's road to the bomb has been blocked in some areas, and torn up in others. But in return, Iran will get access to tens of billions of dollars in frozen funds, and will be able to revive its economy by exporting oil, which until now has been subject to crippling international sanctions.

Was the trade worth it? As sanctions are gradually lifted, what kind of country will Iran become? The danger is that the Iranian government will be re-energized in the wrong way, to stir up more mischief. It could be in an even better position to support destructive movements such as Hezbollah, which has destabilized Lebanon and fought Israel, or tyrannies such as the Assad regime in Syria.

Story continues below advertisement

Iran and Saudi Arabia are already fighting a proxy war in Yemen, and the Iranians might be tempted to engage in more such conflicts. And Iran's power and influence in Iraq could become even greater.

On the other hand, if the P5+1 had simply continued to lay siege to Iran with sanctions, the Iranian theocratic regime would have had little motive to refrain from steadily building itself up into a nuclear-weapons power.

These negotiations were always about forestalling such a result. In that light, the 159-page agreement is a considerable accomplishment. It would have been even better if the International Atomic Energy Agency had been granted the ability to inspect Iranian facilities without notice, but the agreement gives the IAEA "a long-term presence" in the country and a mechanism to "ensure speedy resolution of IAEA access concerns."

In April, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel went to Washington and warned that Iran would keep its "vast nuclear infrastructure" if the deal went ahead. Mr. Netanyahu's objections may have helped stiffen the P5+1's resolve. Two-thirds of Iran's centrifuges are to be removed, and its stockpile of low-enriched uranium is to be reduced by more than 95 per cent.

The agreement doesn't last for ever, but that doesn't mean there's a free-for-all after a decade. Iran is bound by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. The whole cycle could resume. But not for many years.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter