Skip to main content

An undated screenshot of a message recently visible on the Silk Road website. (Handout via The New York Times)

HANDOUT/NYT

The Federal Bureau of Investigation's indictment and arrest of Ross Ulbricht, the libertarian proprietor of a digital business called Silk Road, confirm that, though there can be such a thing as a libertarian, digital currency not backed by any nation-state – in this instance, the Bitcoin – it cannot have liberty from some of the most powerful manifestations of the state: criminal prohibitions and prosecutions.

If the charges are true, Silk Road dealt in a variety of goods, but mostly illegal drugs; "forgeries" was one of the other shopping categories on the site. The FBI indictment says that Silk Road had revenue of about $1.2-billion, from its launch in January, 2011 to its end – which suggests a large proportion of the total quantity of Bitcoin, though the FBI seized only $3.6-million worth.

Freakishly, Internet pseudonymity may have led Mr. Ulbricht to be defrauded into thinking he had successfully hired a hit man to kill a Canadian.

Story continues below advertisement

Even the most technologically adept anarchist is not free of the international state system. The FBI got through Silk Road's encryption and obtained access to its server "in a certain country," thanks to a mutual legal assistance treaty. In the wake of Edward Snowden's disclosures about the U.S. National Security Agency, that invites questions about whether there were any search warrants or any other form of lawful access.

It remains to be seen whether the taming of the Bitcoin and other digital currencies will make them respectable or merely superfluous.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter