Skip to main content

Toronto Mayor John Tory speaks during the debate over new taxi regulations in Toronto last week.

Mark Blinch/Reuters

Contemplating the City of Toronto's latest position on Uber is like contemplating existence itself. You know it's there, but you can't always quite believe it.

Last week, the city effectively outlawed Uber, the app-based taxi service that launched in Toronto in 2012. Where once Uber fell outside the existing rules, the city now defines it as a taxicab broker and limousine service company, which means it can't operate without a municipal licence.

The council also voted to ask city officials to propose a new regulatory framework that in all likelihood will ultimately allow Uber to operate as it always has, regardless of definitions.

Story continues below advertisement

But that's not coming until next year. In the meantime, the city has passed a motion asking Uber to cease its operations until the new framework is brought to council. The company has refused to comply. Mayor John Tory has indicated he is willing to live with that, because enforcing the new rules would be impractical since they might not apply in a year's time.

To recap: Uber is now illegal but the city can't enforce its decision, but it doesn't matter because next year there will be no need to enforce it because Uber won't be illegal any more.

What just happened? Simple. Ride-sharing technology has disrupted the city's outdated taxicab model beyond repair. The Toronto council has delayed the inevitable end of that model by kicking its next major decision down the road. At the same time, it has reduced the basic licensed-taxi fare from $4.25 to $3.25 so that cabbies can better compete with Uber drivers.

In other words, Uber wins. Consumers too.

Editor's Note: The original print version and an earlier digital version of this editorial gave incorrect information about Toronto City Council's vote on Uber. This digital version has been corrected.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter