Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon and junior minister Peter Kent react after Canada was forced into a run-off vote against Portugal at United Nations headquarters in New York on Oct. 12, 2010.

DON EMMERT/AFP / Getty Images

If we are to believe Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon, Canada's reputation at the United Nations is so brittle that a single comment by the opposition leader was enough to undo 2½ years of diplomacy and sink the country's bid to receive a coveted temporary seat on the Security Council.

Michael Ignatieff was a foreign policy intellectual before entering domestic politics, but even so, who would believe he could wield so much influence within the international community, or that the Conservatives would ever admit it if he really does? In fact, if Mr. Ignatieff genuinely does carry such global weight, why did the government not enlist his support early on in a non-partisan effort to win the Security Council seat? If Mr. Ignatieff had the power to torpedo Canada's chances, surely the converse must be true, and he could have clinched the bid.

Mr. Cannon's disappointment is understandable. Portugal has neither the tradition of peacekeeping nor the generosity of aid as a percentage of GDP, nor, being a country that has been in danger of a sovereign default, the reputation for financial and fiscal competence that Canada has. With six of 15 seats as of January, Europe is also overrepresented on the Security Council. The General Assembly vote seems unjust. But his response, lashing out at a domestic political opponent at a news conference at the United Nations on Tuesday, was neither diplomatic nor statesmanlike.

Story continues below advertisement

Of course, absent Mr. Ignatieff's culpability, the defeat is something critics would argue the government should have to wear. In that case, so be it.

Under the Conservatives, Canada has maintained its position of global leadership. It led at the G20/G8 this summer. It was the driving force behind a maternal-health initiative that promises to dramatically improve the lives of countless women in the world's poorest countries. It may hedge on an issue like climate change, but has enunciated an unambiguous message in terms of human rights, and democratic principles. It has aligned itself squarely with countries, such as Israel, which respect such principles. If Canada's failure to win a Security Council seat is a result of Conservative foreign policy, then it says more about the UN than it does about Canada.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies