Skip to main content

Toronto Mayor Rob Ford shouldn’t have to account to a civil servant for what he says on the radio

Toronto Mayor Rob Ford

Kevin Van Paassen/The Globe and Mail

Toronto's integrity commissioner is correct that Mayor Rob Ford and his brother, Councillor Doug Ford, technically violated City Council's code of conduct when they slammed the medical officer of health on their local radio talk show. And by issuing her decision, Janet Leiper was simply exercising her responsibilities as set out by council.

But the Fords did what talk show hosts usually do: they mouthed off, they were derisive, they personalized their attack. Should a public servant be empowered to condemn elected officials for the manner in which they exercise their free speech?

It was a shameful performance, particularly from the Mayor, who has a duty to safeguard morale among and respect for city employees. The Fords attacked Medical Officer of Health Dr. David McKeown over a report calling for lower speed limits to protect pedestrians and cyclists (and motorists, for that matter). The Mayor ridiculed Dr. McKeown's nearly $300,000 salary as "an embarrassment." His brother asked, "Why does he still have a job?" It is legitimate to question the value of such a report, or its findings, but inappropriate and unfair to Dr. McKeown to personalize the attack in such a way.

Story continues below advertisement

Still, it isn't necessary to have an integrity commissioner say as much. It is is best left to voters to determine whether the Mayor is exercising his free speech responsibly. Members of council may rebuke the mayor if they wish. And he's accountable to voters once every four years for his behaviour.

Mr. Ford – the Mayor – is wrong in lashing back by declaring that the position of integrity commissioner should be scrapped. He has only to look down the highway toward Montreal to see the costs, financial and otherwise, of a system with no integrity and no commissioner. The city created the office after a computer-leasing scandal that cost it millions of dollars and bred public cynicism. There is no evidence to suggest that office is politically motivated, as the mayor has suggested.

But bureaucratic oversight of the speech of elected officials is a troubling matter.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.