Skip to main content

artist rendering of the proposed "Mother Canada" memorial in Cape Breton. Credit: Never Forgotten National Memorial Foundation.

Stephen Harper was passionate about Canadian history. But his government also understood how it could be used to serve political ends.

With the change in government, it is time to reassess two prospective historical monuments that the Harper government promoted with a zeal that overrode proper public scrutiny.

The first is the controversial Memorial to the Victims of Communism, planned for a prime piece of Ottawa's parliamentary real estate near the Supreme Court of Canada – a site long designated for a new Federal Court building.

Story continues below advertisement

The privately backed memorial raises many yellow flags, from its daunting scale and discouraging message (corpses figured largely in the original design) to its questionable location and dependence on taxpayer funding. The biggest complaint from opponents was the partisanship of the process that discouraged broad public consultation. The memorial was seen as a pet project of Conservative ministers who, in seeking the support of groups linked to the monument's anti-Communist message, fast-tracked its development with a fervour that shut down opposition.

The National Capital Commission did well to soften the harsh design of the project, but its wisest move was to postpone any decisions until after the federal election. The incoming Liberal government now has the opportunity to give the memorial the critical attention it deserves. At the very least, it should be moved to a more suitable location, away from such a prime site in the heart of the capital.

The same critical gaze should be turned on the outsized Mother Canada statue, a privately promoted expression of monumentality proposed for an evocative coastline site in Cape Breton Highlands National Park. Like its counterpart in Ottawa, this gigantic tribute to Canada's war dead, whose style and scale would do Stalin proud, has proved to be a disheartening exercise in disunity – largely because the overseers of Parks Canada severely limited public input into the highly flawed proposal's design and purpose.

While the eight-storey monolith enjoys local support from those who hope it will create jobs and draw tourists, it remains an ugly and unfitting memorial. History needs to honoured by something better than a monumental mistake.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter