Skip to main content

Cute little twins

Digital Vision/Getty Images

On the surface, it seems patently unfair to deny the parents of newborn twins, triplets and other multiple-birth children increased parental benefits. The Federal Court of Appeal doesn't see it that way, however, and ruled Thursday that parents caring for multiple newborns aren't being discriminated against under the Charter of Rights and Freedom when they are denied additional parental leave. The case may now be headed to the Supreme Court but, before it gets there, Ottawa should take matters into its own hands and amend the rules to bring a bit of common sense and fairness to the situation.

The case was brought by parents of identical twins. When their daughters were born in 2009, they both applied for the standard 35-week parental leave benefit, a benefit that is normally shared between each parent when a single child is born. In this case, the mother applied for the full leave to take care of one of the children, and the father did the same for the other child. The Employment Insurance Commission rejected the father's claim on the grounds the twins were the result of a single pregnancy. The couple overturned the commission's decision on appeal, but then the federal government stepped in, won its appeal in a lower court, and has now seen its appeal upheld.

It's hard to see the Charter merits of the case, although the couple says it will seek leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. They feel they are being discriminated against, but the federal court ruled that having twins does not "establish the kind of historical disadvantage that perpetuates prejudice or stereotyping."

Story continues below advertisement

At the same time, the three-judge panel agreed that "the care of twins or, for that matter, any other multiples, necessarily involves more work than caring for a single child." And therein lies the unfairness of the current system. Canada needs children, and it needs policies that encourage parents to have them. The couple that produces twins or other multiple births is fulfilling this vital role in, to be frank, the most efficient way possible. Under the current rules, they are producing two children, in terms of cost to the government and lost working hours, for the price of one.

Look at it another way: Most couples will produce two children over the course of two pregnancies, and each time they will be eligible for the parental leave and will take time off work. The couple that gives birth to twins will not receive the same benefits or the same amount of time off. Ottawa recently introduced legislation to extend EI benefits to the parents of gravely ill or injured children, a recognition of the fact that not all parents face exactly the same challenges. We are not saying that Ottawa should allow the parents of twins and triplets to proportionately increase their parental leave, but it could certainly consider raising it from 35 weeks to acknowledge the peculiar difficulties and societal benefits of multiple births.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.