Skip to main content

British Columbia premier Christy Clark (R) smiles as she and Brad Wall, premier of Saskatchewan, make an announcement during the Council of the Federation summit in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, August 29, 2014. REUTERS/Christinne Muschi (CANADA - Tags: POLITICS)

CHRISTINNE MUSCHI/REUTERS

The Council of Federation – the grand name for the annual premiers' meeting – has a gift for the anticlimactic. Last week's premiers' conference was headlined by discussions about interprovincial free trade, as promised. But action on trade? Not so much. Then, on the final day of the conference, Premier Christy Clark of British Columbia and Premier Brad Wall of Saskatchewan announced a momentous breakthrough. The people of their respective provinces will soon be able to legally order wine from wineries in the province, and craft spirits too.

That's it? After Mr. Wall's spirited threat to start a retaliatory interprovincial trade war if interprovincial trade barriers are not brought down, the resulting deal is, if we may refer to wine bottle sizes, the tinniest Piccolo rather than the promised Jeroboam.

As readers may have guessed, there are many more wineries in B.C. than in Saskatchewan, but there is no need for exact symmetry. (That's why it's called free trade, see?) Wine reciprocity will be in effect at or before the end of 2014. Craft spirits will be able to cross the relevant borders in June, 2015.

Story continues below advertisement

It's odd that B.C. and Saskatchewan had to enter into a specific free-trade arrangement on this at all, considering that B.C., Alberta and Saskatchewan are already members of an economic and trade area called the New West Partnership, a successor to an earlier Alberta-B.C. alliance called TILMA. The fact that it was necessary to do a special deal to let Saskatchewanians buy B.C. wine shows how fractured the country's common market really is.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter