Skip to main content

Aneel Samra, 18, holds a soccer ball in his backyard in Montreal. Samra has not been able to play organized soccer since last year because of his religious headgear.

Ryan Remiorz/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Soccer at all levels will someday soon be hit with the same tsunami of public concern about head injuries that has hit hockey and football. It's in this light that the Quebec Soccer Federation's ban on the turbans worn by large numbers of young Sikh players should be seen. At a time of rising public concern about the sport's real dangers, the federation is wasting time and energy battling an invented danger, for which it has presented not a shard of evidence.

If helmets are allowed on players' heads – and they are – why not turbans? FIFA, the governing body for international soccer, allows protective headgear. The Canadian Soccer Association, which justifiably suspended the Quebec federation on Monday, allows it, too. (One brand is described as resembling a lightweight headband covering the forehead, temples and occipital bone in back of the head.) Headgear has been worn by players at the professional, university and youth levels. As in hockey's earlier days, however, it is often seen as wimpy – even in girls' soccer – to wear a helmet.

Scott Delaney, a McGill University researcher, has found that soccer players have rates of head injury similar to football and hockey players. Researchers have also raised concerns about long-term brain damage from repeated subconcussive blows from heading the ball. "Preliminary research has shown [protective headgear] may decrease the number of concussions and soft tissue injuries of the head," a 2010 position paper of the Canadian Academy of Sports Medicine says.

Story continues below advertisement

Soccer needs a debate on brain safety, not a debate on turbans.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter