Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

David Shribman is executive editor of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and a winner of the Pulitzer Prize for coverage of U.S. politics.

Perhaps the death of no one else in the United States would so profoundly transform the country as Saturday's sudden passing of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.

Justice Scalia, who died in Texas at 79, was perhaps the most important American jurist, and surely the most significant conservative court member, in generations. His death changes the balance of power in the United States' highest court even as it opens up a brutal political fight that already has engulfed the other two branches of government – and immediately set them against each other in a high-stakes, no-compromise confrontation that has few precedents in U.S. history.

Story continues below advertisement

But there is more. Justice Scalia's demise changes the rhythm and the themes of the presidential election. It deprives the conservative movement of one of its signature heroes and intellectual touchstones. It removes the leading proponent of "original intent" – the controversial doctrine that the U.S. Constitution should be interpreted through 18th-century eyes rather than through 21st-century perspectives – from court deliberations. And it eliminates one of the most innovative minds from American intellectual life.

Moreover – difficult to observe but impossible to ignore – the death of Justice Scalia changes the character of the Supreme Court, at once the most mysterious and most intimate of American institutions. Justice Scalia may have been the most conservative member of the court, but he was beloved by those who regarded him as their most trenchant and most intransigent sparring partner.

This avatar of conservatism was a constant holiday travelling companion and opera partner of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, perhaps the most liberal member of the court. The two actually inspired an opera themselves called, inevitably, Scalia/Ginsburg, which had its premier last July at Lorin Maazel's Castleton Festival, though excerpts were performed earlier at the court itself. Mr. Scalia's opening aria includes the reprise line: "The justices are blind!"

Washington this week may be shrouded in genuine grief – even Democrats who bitterly blamed Justice Scalia for the court's verdict that Governor George W. Bush defeated Vice-President Albert Gore Jr. in the deadlocked, overtime election of 2000 mourned the passing of an original American mind – but the American capital already is riven with contentious debate.

President Barack Obama is determined to nominate a successor jurist who would shift the court balance to the left, affecting issues ranging from the future of Obamacare to the Obama ban on coal-fired power plants. Republicans on Capitol Hill and on the campaign trail in South Carolina, the latest staging ground for the remaining GOP pugilists, are just as determined to prevent him from prevailing.

These Republicans want the next president to choose the next justice, though there remain more than 10 months before the current Congress, where Republicans control the Senate and thus the confirmation process, expires. That is more than enough time, for in the past four decades these nominations and confirmations generally have taken fewer than three months to be resolved. In their debate Saturday night, Republican front-runner Donald Trump implored Senate Republicans to "delay, delay, delay," essentially running out the clock on Mr. Obama.

But if a Democrat wins the White House, the GOP strategy would bear little fruit, and could actually backfire.

Story continues below advertisement

If, for example, former secretary of state Hillary Clinton is elected, those same Republican senators could face the possibility that she nominates Mr. Obama himself to the court. As a former president and Senate colleague, Mr. Obama would be difficult to dismiss as unqualified. (He also is a graduate of Harvard Law School, was president of the law review there and he taught constitutional law.)

There is precedence here; eight years after William Howard Taft left the White House, President Warren Harding nominated him to be Chief Justice. He was confirmed that very day by a 60-4 vote in 1921.

By far the greatest influence of Justice Scalia – and by far the biggest loss resulting from his death – was the intellectual vigour he brought to strict constructionism and originalism, which enjoyed only limited appeal in American life until Justice Scalia infected it with vibrancy and passion.

Today, that view, once derided in liberal academic circles as the intellectual equivalent of creationism, has fresh relevance and respect – and is embraced, with enthusiasm and fervour, on the Republican hustings. And so in death, perhaps as much as in life, Justice Scalia is shaping the American political, social, cultural and intellectual landscape in a way that few others have done.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies