Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

The release of Statistics Canada's National Household Survey this week reminded Canadians of one of the saddest yet most revealing characteristics of the Harper government: intransigence driven by ideology.

For a very long time, and for very good reasons, a long-form survey was mandatory for citizens. Making it mandatory heightened the reliability of the results depended on by so many institutions and analysts. The mandatory survey helped Statistics Canada maintain its worldwide reputation for excellence.

Suddenly, however, it struck Prime Minister Stephen Harper that the mandatory answering of questions represented an unacceptable intrusion on liberty and privacy. No matter that the greater good required mandatory participation; ideology and a political appeal to his party's core supporters required scrapping mandatory participation.

Story continues below advertisement

There had been no warning of the Prime Minister's thinking. Even the tub-thumpers of the political right hadn't previously found much to complain about with the mandatory survey. Conservative MPs had to admit that, no, constituents hadn't been asking about it. Prime ministerial fiat turned a complete non-issue into a national one.

The Canada-wide reaction was as close to unanimous as possible. More than 200 groups and prominent citizens schooled in public policy publicly objected, whereas only three supported the change – these being among the hardy perennials of the far right. Seldom in recent memory has civic society been arrayed so firmly against a government decision.

To no avail. The Prime Minister had made up his mind. The word went out from the Conservative propaganda machine that liberties were being threatened. Conservative MPs were given their talking points. Not even the honourable resignation of Statistics Canada head Munir Sheikh, whose words had been shamelessly twisted by then-industry minister Tony Clement, could halt the destruction of the gold-standard survey and its replacement with a bronze-plated one.

Statistics Canada reported this week that some of the results from the latest survey, the voluntary one, are "not comparable" with previous surveys. This admission is devastating for those who try to analyze what has been happening in Canadian society over time.

What did the census affair demonstrate? Prime ministerial diktat to be sure, since the decision came from the very top and nowhere else. The kowtowing of ministers and MPs to prime ministerial power – not for the first time, and not only in this government. A disregard for the best scientific evidence. But most revealing, a fierce determination to proceed in the face of overwhelming opposition.

The issues and dynamics are different, but you can see this same attitude at work in the government's approach to telecommunications competition. It's very much a "them-against-us" mentality. Cross the government publicly and you land on the "enemies list," which is where the Big Three telcos – Rogers, Bell and Telus – now find themselves.

That the government's repeated attempts to open up the wireless market to more competition have failed, and that the latest gambit to interest Verizon to enter Canada flopped, is irrelevant.

Story continues below advertisement

The telcos were frightened by the possible arrival of the U.S. behemoth. They took on the government with full-page newspaper ads, their executives made public statements damning the government and tried by every means to stir up public opposition to Verizon's possible entry into the Canadian market on excessively favourable terms.

One presumes that most Canadians don't get riled up about census surveys, but they do about wireless. Rightly or wrongly, citizens feel the Big Three's rates are too high and the conditions they impose on users unfair.

Knowing this, the government made introducing more competition the core of its policy. Even though it has largely failed, and even though Verizon says it has no interest in Canada, you can bet every dollar you have that the government won't forget the hostility of the Big Three.

During the weeks of public squabbling, the Conservative propaganda machine was pumping out messages to members about taking on the telcos. Now the Industry Department (i.e. you, the taxpayer) is running ads countering what it insists are misrepresentations by the Big Three.

The government has lost one battle against the telcos with Verizon's disclaimer of interest. One lost battle, however, does not mean the war is over.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies