Skip to main content

Timothy Garton Ash is professor of European studies at Oxford University, where he currently leads the freespeechdebate.com project, and a Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University. His latest book is Facts are Subversive: Political Writing from a Decade Without a Name.

Europe must save Greece. The consequences of keeping Greece within the euro zone will be bad, but those of its leaving would be worse. They would be not just economic, but human, geopolitical and historic. Europe would never be the same again.

I was in Greece two weeks ago, and grasped this at every turn, from standing on the ancient Pnyx, the birthplace of democracy, through talking to leaders of the business community, journalists and academics, many of whom were witheringly critical of the current Syriza government. But since then I have been back in northern Europe, in England, Belgium and now Poland, and in the north I find not just relative indifference (Greece is more often the subject of jokes than of deep concern) but also two dangerous illusions.

Story continues below advertisement

First, there is still a widespread assumption that this Greek-German game of "chicken" will somehow end in a last-minute, classic Brussels-style incomprehensible compromise. Second, and sometimes alternatively, there is the view that a Grexit would not matter that much anyway: Greece represents less than 2 per cent of the euro zone's economic output, and the euro zone now has firewalls to prevent the flames spreading to other South European countries. Why should hard-working people, from Ireland to Latvia, who have taken the pain of structural reform and austerity, these people say, go on paying for those who have not? Maybe in the end a Grexit would be better for all concerned. Francesco Giavazzi, an economics professor at Bocconi University in Milan, even dares to write: "We should ask ourselves whether it is really so important to keep Greece inside the EU."

Let's take these two illusions in turn. First, it could happen tomorrow. Greek bank deposits are sinking like water from a cracked water tank: more than €500-million ($697-million) on one day alone, Friday, June 5, after the government had aborted a scheduled payment to the IMF. The rich have already got much of their money out of the country and the poor are stashing it under their mattresses. One more panic, a run on the banks, and you would have capital controls and a bankrupt government issuing IOUs to pay wages and pensions. Zeus alone knows what would follow. Perhaps it could still be saved, with a kind of negotiated default inside the euro zone, but only the most irresponsible playboy game theorist would count on it. A Grexit could happen by Graccident.

And why would it matter if it happened? For starters, the markets would know that euro zone membership is not irreversible. Contagion to the government bonds of the next weakest euro zone debtor nation would probably not be immediate, but any new crisis in a weak economy could potentially trigger aggressive speculation.

Then there is the economic and therefore human cost in Greece. It is pointless at this stage to go over all the mistakes of the past: there are enough to fill all the confessionals in all the churches in the great city of Wroclaw (where I write these lines). Needless to say, Greece should never have become a member of the euro zone, which should itself never have been introduced at all with such a flawed design. Needless to say, Greek governments able to borrow at German interest rates made an already bad situation worse during the early years of the euro, in cahoots with their oligarchs; the post-crisis medicine prescribed by Germany and the International Monetary Fund was almost bound to worsen the condition of such a sickly patient; the patient only pretended to take some of that medicine; and so on. But this is not the moment to be quarrelling over history.

Apportion the blame where you will; the fact remains that many Greeks have suffered terribly. In cold figures, real spending in the Greek economy fell by roughly a third in seven years, with close to one in every two young people out of work. A colder figure still: The number of deaths by suicide has increased by more than 35 per cent since 2010. I cannot get out of my head the story of Theodoros Giannaros, the head of Elpis hospital in Athens, exhausted, chain-smoking, working 20 hours a day with drastically cut medical resources; and as Dr. Giannaros worked to save lives, he received news that his 26-year-old son had taken his own life by jumping in front of an underground train.

If Greece fell out of the euro zone, nobody knows exactly what would happen, but the Nobel prize-winning economist Christopher Pissarides reckons the result might be the most dramatic fall in living standards in recent economic history. And every Greek would cry: "For what did we take all this pain?" Since the country still has the political system invented in ancient Athens, and practised on the Pnyx, this mixture of fury and despair would be expressed through the ballot box. Unless some miracle intervened, that would surely result in an even more radical, populist, nationalist government, whether of the left or the right.

This would have grave consequences for the whole European Union and its place in the world. Whether or not in strict legal theory an exit from the euro zone should entail an exit from the EU, in practice fellow member states would try to keep it in – and, in the worst case, the practicalities of disentanglement would take years. Meanwhile, a post-Grexit radical Greek government could, for example, start by vetoing a further extension of sanctions on Russia over Ukraine. While Moscow would not actually put up much money, it would be more than happy to play the political card of solidarity between two great nations of the Orthodox faith. As for those thousands of refugees from the Middle East and Africa already coming across the Mediterranean, Athens would have no incentive not to pass them straight on to those richer Europeans who (as most Greeks would see it) had left Greece in the lurch.

Story continues below advertisement

I asked a former Turkish minister how Turkey would react. Well, he said, with the devalued neo-drachma, Greece would offer Turkey's tourist industry more competition on price, but geopolitically, a Grexit would further weaken the attraction of EU membership. Instead, Turkey, which is not a member of the euro zone, would look to be a regional power in its own right.

Meanwhile, China already owns the container port of Piraeus in Athens and has designated it as a vital entry point to Europe in its hugely ambitious One Belt, One Road strategy, sometimes known as the "new silk road." Beijing, with its vast foreign currency reserves, would be more than happy to pick up some more of the pieces – and thereby also gain further influence inside the EU. The place that was once the cradle of both Europe and democracy – the Greek fleet that defeated ancient Persia at the Battle of Salamis sailed from the harbour of Piraeus – would now be just the tip of the tail of the Chinese dragon. And sooner or later, there would be a sting in that tail.

Thus, even if you have not a drop of sympathy in your heart for the Greeks, not even for Dr. Giannaros and his lost son, so long as you have a brain in your head and care at all about the future of Europe, you will understand why we must save Greece.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter