Skip to main content

By all accounts, B.C. premier-designate John Horgan's first phone conversation with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau went well. The P-word wasn't even raised.

The two talked about the softwood lumber dispute with the U.S., housing, transit and the fentanyl crisis that has B.C. in its deadly grip. Mr. Horgan's opposition to the Trudeau-approved Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain pipeline expansion was apparently not even mentioned.

Why get things off on the wrong foot?

Story continues below advertisement

Related: Trudeau, Notley welcome B.C.'s Horgan despite Trans Mountain pipeline rift

Read more: Trans Mountain pipeline's necessity questioned as tanker traffic slumps

Ever since B.C. Lieutenant-Governor Judith Guichon accepted Christy Clark's resignation as premier last week and gave Mr. Horgan's NDP (with the help of the three-seat Green party) the opportunity to govern, the future of the pipeline expansion has become a hot topic.

And nowhere more than in Alberta.

It's noteworthy that the pipeline was not among the matters Mr. Horgan offered up as early priorities for him, a list that mostly included the items he discussed with the Prime Minister. In fact, the pipeline is not something Mr. Horgan enjoys talking about. He barely mentioned it during this spring's provincial election campaign.

I'm sure if it were completely up to him, he'd launch a half-hearted effort to stop the project and then wave the white flag, saying it's too far along to do much about. That may ultimately be what happens anyway. But unfortunately, the terms of his employment as B.C.'s newest premier effectively includes a partnership clause with the Greens.

Green Party leader Andrew Weaver is much more steadfast in his opposition to the project than Mr. Horgan. But, of course, the NDP government's longevity depends, in part, on the Green party's support. Consequently, Mr. Horgan is going to have to put up much more of a fight against the pipeline than he might have otherwise.

Story continues below advertisement

A number of groups opposed to it will get their time in court this fall. If the judiciary sides with the project detractors, then Mr. Horgan is off the hook. If it doesn't, then he will have to see what tools he has available to somehow make it economically unviable for the project proponent.

At that point, however, we are likely talking a few years' away and who knows what the political situation in B.C. is going to be then.

Much has been made about the tension that is likely to exist between Alberta Premier Rachel Notley's NDP government and Mr. Horgan's. I doubt the predicted friction will be anything close to what is being forecast.

The two governments have far more to gain by working in each other's best interests than trying to undermine one another. There are tight connections between some of Ms. Notley's most senior staff and their counterparts in Mr. Horgan's office. There is far greater likelihood that the two governments will find areas in which to co-operate and leave the fate of the pipeline to play out in a courtroom.

That said, Mr. Horgan will have to remain cognizant of the feelings of his political partner, Mr. Weaver.

The NDP will face a fearsome enemy in the B.C. Liberals, a group that will boast one of the most experienced Opposition benches the B.C. legislature has ever seen. They know that when you have a government with a slim one-seat majority, all it takes is one person to upset the calculus and throw everything into chaos.

Story continues below advertisement

The Liberals will be trying to sow division between the NDP and the Greens at every turn. They will taunt Mr. Weaver about allowing his party to be subsumed by the NDP and try to get him to begin questioning his commitment to Mr. Horgan's party.

This is a given.

Nonetheless, it sounds like Mr. Horgan has his early priorities right. The war on fentanyl hasn't been as effective as hoped. Even with the many measures that Ottawa, the province and B.C. cities have taken to quell the devastation the drug is taking on communities, hundreds continue to die. It is a scourge the likes of which the province has never known.

Meantime, the softwood lumber dispute is a far greater threat to B.C. at the moment than any pipeline. The countervailing duties the U.S. has imposed on Canadian lumber exports could jeopardize thousands of jobs in the province.

Expect to hear John Horgan talk much more about this in the coming weeks and months, than any pipeline.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.