Skip to main content

OxyContin tablets are shown in a pharmacy.

Toby Talbot/Toby Talbot/The Associated Press

Like many Canadians, I'm deeply troubled by the epidemic of prescription painkiller addiction and the rising number of accidental and deliberate deaths attributed to OxyContin. As a doctor who has treated chronic pain, I have insight into how we got here and what we can do about it.

Recently, the news media have been examining the marketing campaign behind OxyContin, focusing on the relationship between Canadian doctors and Purdue Pharma, the drug's manufacturer. I am among those mentioned in this coverage.

I'd like to explain what I was trying to accomplish by working with Purdue and why I no longer do so.

Story continues below advertisement

In the late 1980s, I became aware of the undertreatment of patients with severe chronic pain. Following a groundbreaking paper and a series of randomized and controlled clinical trials, it was concluded that narcotics given to patients with no history of drug abuse could improve the lives of those with chronic pain without greatly causing or contributing to addiction. I started an office practice in the early 1990s, prescribing narcotics to people with severe chronic pain. It didn't work for everyone, but, for a good percentage, these drugs were highly effective.

Purdue Pharma took note of my growing expertise in the field. As the company prepared to launch several forms of narcotic pain relievers, including OxyContin, it offered to sponsor some of my talks at hospitals and continuing medical education events.

I wanted to help teach doctors who were getting very little training in pain management and to help patients who were in pain. I never underplayed the risk of addiction, always urging colleagues to carefully assess patients and to make certain other remedies had been tried first.

I'm proud of the role I played in making opioids more available to patients who need them by teaching doctors how to prescribe them carefully. Opioid pain relievers have helped thousands of Canadians suffer less pain and enjoy active lives. But I have watched with great dismay the rising tide of prescription drug abuse in general, and OxyContin in particular.

In recent years, I've seen doctors overprescribe opioids to patients without screening or monitoring them for addiction. I've seen doctors prescribe powerful narcotics in assembly-line fashion at walk-in clinics.

I no longer believe it to be possible for educational courses paid for by drug companies to be free of corporate bias. But the practice of recruiting and paying doctors to give company-sponsored talks is alive and well – and the practice doesn't end with opioid pain relievers. Blood-pressure pills, diabetes meds and cholesterol-lowering drugs are just some of the remedies for which doctors are recruited to influence their colleagues.

From my medical vantage point, I see a culture of indifference to the influence pharmaceutical money has on many of us. In the past few years, regulations have been strengthened to compel doctors to acknowledge that they have received funding from drug companies, but these rules don't go far enough. We need to make a difference by following the lead set by the United States, where Congress has passed a bipartisan measure requiring that physicians report payments by drug companies.

Story continues below advertisement

I call for legislators, drug companies and doctors in Canada to do the same. This should be the first step in changing a culture that's grown far too cozy with corporate interests, and restoring trust between doctors and patients.

Brian Goldman is as an emergency physician in Toronto and the host of White Coat, Black Art on CBC Radio One.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.