Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Quite likely, without being aware of the fact, Canadians might be seeing their last majority government. Not for the next four years, but forever.

Three parties – New Democrats, Liberals and Greens – are pledging to replace the existing voting system (first past the post) with something else. Whatever that something-else system turns out to be, it would be more difficult to produce a one-party, majority government of the kind Canada has usually had since Confederation.

The so-called "smack of firm government" of a party with a majority in Parliament would be over. No more friendly dictatorships. Government by bargaining and internal compromise would replace government with the unilateral ability to decide.

Story continues below advertisement

The Conservatives, of course, favour the existing voting system. If they were to win a majority government on Oct. 19, the status quo would remain. Their chances of recapturing power with a majority, however, are slim. A minority on election night is possible, but it would be unlikely to survive in Parliament against the combined forces of the other parties.

The NDP has long favoured what is called a blended system of proportional representation, whereby voters cast two ballots, one for a constituency and one for a party list. The NDP promises to replace the existing system with proportional representation early in a mandate. Variations of the system they prefer exist in Europe (notably Germany) and in New Zealand.

The aim of the many types of proportional representation is to match a party's share of the votes with its share of parliamentary seats, the argument being that this is more "democratic." (The Greens also favour proportional representation because whatever its theoretical virtue, it gives them the best chance of being part of a government.)

In a multiple-party system, such as what now exists in Canada, one party seldom takes half the votes. (The Progressive Conservatives did so in 1984). As a result, no party would enjoy a majority of seats in Parliament under proportional representation. Coalition governments would become the new governing norm.

The Liberals have promised that Oct. 19 will be the last election under the existing system. They have not settled on an alternative. It could be proportional representation along the German or New Zealand lines; it could be a single-transferable vote as used in Ireland; it could be a preferential ballot, as is used in elections for Australia's lower house. Preferential voting does tend to produce majorities.

Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau has spoken favourably about the preferential system, in which voters take the list of candidates and rank their preferences in order. But he altered his position to say that widespread public consultations should occur before a new system would be proposed in Parliament. He has repeated, however, that first past the post has to go.

Changing the electoral system would be a dramatic shift from almost a century and a half of political practice. It fires up political scientists as a fit subject for graduate student seminars. Pressure groups such as Fair Vote Canada lobby for change. Within the three opposition parties, members agitate for change.

Story continues below advertisement

The general public seems not much interested in electoral change, judging by how little the parties who want change have mentioned their ideas in the campaign. With their omnipresent focus groups and internal polls to guide what to talk about, parties follow rather than lead public opinion.

If the voters were charged up about system change, the parties would be talking about it incessantly, as they do about the economy. Or, if they thought change might be a wedge issue, they would be all over it as the Conservatives are about women wearing a niqab at citizenship ceremonies.

No party has committed itself to letting voters decide in a plebiscite, maybe because they fear change might lose.

When tested provincially, voters opted for the status quo. British Columbia and Ontario established constituent assemblies of citizens. The assemblies held hearings, debated the issue with intensity and recommended change, only to find their ideas rejected by voters, although the first time around in British Columbia, change almost acquired the required 60-per-cent threshold.

Quebec and New Brunswick began legislative studies into proportional representation, but both initiatives petered out. In PEI, 92 per cent of voters rejected PR in a 2005 plebiscite.

Canadians, when asked, have preferred the first-past-the-post devil they know to the PR devil they don't. The opposition parties, however, are gung ho for change. If they succeed, one-party majority governments would be a thing of the past.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies