Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Let’s not get railroaded again on infrastructure

Public-private partnerships are not a new idea. By the time of Confederation, they were already old hat.

Sir Hugh Allan, one of the 19th century's most successful entrepreneurs, built a shipping empire with government subsidies designed to encourage the private sector to develop the infrastructure – ocean liners – to carry immigrants and mail between Britain and Canada. He then branched out into railroads, leaning on Quebec government subsidies to promote rail building. And a few years after Confederation, prime minister Sir John A. Macdonald's government awarded Sir Hugh the contract to build and operate the Dominion of Canada's National Dream, its great public-private megaproject, the railway to the Pacific.

Back then, the term "Canadian infrastructure bank" had not yet been coined. But Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and the leading lights of his cabinet were on Monday pitching global investors on something similar to the tool that 19th-century Canada used to encourage private investment in projects for the public good.

Story continues below advertisement

Related: Ottawa to make 'unprecedented' appeal for private investment in infrastructure

Related: Trudeau touts Canada as safe option for infrastructure investment

Read more: Liberals prepare to pitch infrastructure bank to investors

Take the Canadian Pacific Railway. British Columbia was induced to join Confederation in 1871 with the promise that it would be linked to the rest of Canada by railroad. That railroad was seen as necessary for Canada to grow, settle the West – and avoid being annexed by the United States. Building the railway was public policy. But it was felt that the only way to get it built quickly and at the lowest cost to the taxpayer was to hand the job over to private investors.

However, a railway across the difficult Canadian Shield, through the vast and largely unpopulated Prairies and over the Rockies, was not something investors were willing to sink money into without some public support. Which is where the public-private partnership comes in.

In 2016, the government is talking about creating a Canadian infrastructure bank, seeded with $35-billion in public money. The hope is that, for every public dollar invested, it should be able attract four or five dollars in private capital, thereby multiplying the impact, and increasing the amount of infrastructure built.

That's basically how Canada got investors to build the CPR. Ottawa gave the railroad $25-million in cash, agreed to reimburse $37-million in surveying cost, and granted it 25 million acres of land. Those inducements convinced private investors to deploy even more capital, resulting in the driving of the last spike in 1885.

Story continues below advertisement

There is almost nothing new under the sun, and building infrastructure through public-private partnerships is not a new idea. Nor is it a crazy idea. But it's not a magic idea. It doesn't conjure money out of the air. At the end of the day, somebody has to pay. And to the extent that it isn't the taxpayer, it will be the user.

The Trudeau government now has a group of investment bankers evaluating the possibility of privatizing Canada's airports, and another firm considering the ports. These don't even need to be public-private partnerships – if these assets are to be sold off, it should be a simple privatization. Canada's ports and airports don't need a taxpayer subsidy.

But if they are privatized, what they are going to need is heavy government oversight and regulation. Why? Because they're all monopolies or near-monopolies. Calgary isn't going to have multiple competing airports. If ports and airports – and sewage systems, electricity grids, highways and bridges – are privatized, the job of government becomes more essential than ever. It must protect consumers and citizens against the people who just bought its formerly public assets. It has to regulate the newly privatized monopolies so that they make a reasonable profit, but not more. Once the deals are done, it has to adopt a somewhat adversarial relationship.

Unfortunately, from the Gilded Age to the World Economic Forum, that's not normally how politicians tend to act when they start getting cozy with deep-pocketed men bearing gifts.

Canada's first great infrastructure project was a public-private partnership, but so was Canada's first political scandal. It led to the resignation of the first prime minister.

In 1873, in what became known as the Pacific Scandal, it was revealed that the public trust had been sold out. In return for the CPR contract, Sir Hugh Allan had given $350,000 to Sir John A. Macdonald's re-election campaign. A mari usque ad mare, caveat emptor.

Story continues below advertisement

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading…

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.