Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }
Coronavirus information
Coronavirus information
The Zero Canada Project provides resources to help you make the most of staying home.
Visit the hub

A passenger in a protective mask uses her phone at Rome's Fiumicino airport, after the first cases of coronavirus were confirmed in Italy, on Jan. 31, 2020.

YARA NARDI/Reuters

Letters to the Editor should be exclusive to The Globe and Mail. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. Try to keep letters to fewer than 150 words. Letters may be edited for length and clarity. To submit a letter by e-mail, click here: letters@globeandmail.com

Coronavirus: By the numbers

Re Canadian Evacuees From Epicentre Of Coronavirus Outbreak To Be Quarantined For Two Weeks At CFB Trenton (Feb. 3): Ottawa is planning to fly 325 Canadians back to CFB Trenton for quarantine. If the coronavirus, or a similar virus, were to break out in Hong Kong, how would the government deal with the possibility of having to airlift approximately 300,000 Canadians back home? Would we be ready to deal with the epidemic?

Doug Turner Victoria

Story continues below advertisement


Re Research Supports Canada’s Decision To Reject A Coronavirus Travel Ban (Feb. 4): I believe this is an incomplete representation of the evidence. If travel restrictions are not initiated too late and are sufficiently rigorous, other research suggests it can delay the peak of a pandemic wave by months. A 2014 study published by the World Health Organization shows that such a delay may provide extra time to evaluate and procure antiviral medications and other treatments, implement public health intervention strategies, organize assessment centres and perhaps delay the peak into warmer months, during which many respiratory viruses circulate less well.

Specialists called for strong travel restrictions almost two weeks ago. Unfortunately, the debate now may well be moot.

Monir Taha MD, FRCPC; Ottawa

Beginning to end

Re A Mi’kmaq Community’s Fears Of Toxic Water Recede As Northern Pulp Mill Winds Down (Feb. 4): I was the ripe old age of 9 when the Northern Pulp mill opened in 1967 and I swam in the new and untreated effluent from Boat Harbour. Our cottage was located just yards away from the entrance to this once-pristine tidal lagoon. I swam in it on many occasions in the years afterward, until we were expropriated by the Nova Scotia government. For my family, and others nearby, the solution to pollution was not dilution – it was expropriation. The nearby Boat Harbour Mi’kmaq band was not so fortunate.

I’ve watched this travesty continue for more than 50 years with successive governments (of all stripes) and mill owners (and there were many) that never fixed the mess. Pictou County is now divided over the closure of the mill, fishers versus foresters. Government and industry, meet the gong show. A case study of Boat Harbour should be a required course in science and business in all Canadian universities.

John Budreski Vancouver

Mine craft

Re Teck’s Emissions Plan Lacks Substantial Detail, Federal Environment Minister Says (Feb. 4): Justin Trudeau’s cabinet decision on the Teck Frontier mine is due by the end of the month – the first real climate test for this government. I oppose the expansion of oil-sands production and call on Liberal ministers to reject the project.

Story continues below advertisement

Teck Frontier seems incompatible with Canada’s climate targets: It would emit as much as six megatonnes of carbon emissions per year; result in “significant adverse" effects on Indigenous rights and irreversible environmental damage, according to a federal-provincial panel, as well as the loss of habitat for local species such as wood bison and whooping crane; and never be financially viable, I believe, due to a reliance on unrealistically high oil prices.

Dorothy Goldin Rosenberg MES, PhD; Toronto


Despite catastrophic fires and a world withdrawing from coal-generated power, Australia is holding fast to its coal industry – likely to its detriment. Canada would be wise to look to Australia as a warning. By stamping a No on the Teck Frontier mine, Canada would demonstrate to the world that a country rich in fossil-fuel reserves can walk away from new development and focus on transitioning to a clean-energy economy.

A Yes, on the other hand, would serve as a significant blow to many Canadians who expect effective action on the climate crisis, and to a world in need of countries that are bold climate leaders.

Cheryl McNamara Toronto


With its mantra of environment and economy going hand in hand, the Trudeau government seems to face a lose-lose binary on the Teck Frontier mine. If it is approved, they face the wrath of environmentalists and three parties in a minority government. If it is blocked, they face a province or two threatening to secede.

Story continues below advertisement

I believe there is a way out of this trap: The government could green-light the project with the condition that no oil will flow unless Canada meets its greenhouse-gas reduction targets, or is convincingly on track, taking into account the incremental emissions from the mine’s operation.

Under this condition, Jason Kenney would have to step up. If the project is so important – and climate disaster can be avoided even with expanding oil-sands production, as he says – Alberta should embrace the national effort to bring down GHG emissions. That would mean the rapid phase-out of coal-fired power, tougher emission standards and effective carbon pricing.

The great majority of Canadians support the Paris Agreement. In this context, one of the only responsible ways for Alberta to maintain current production levels of oil and gas, let alone expand, would be to become enthusiastic partners in meeting the Paris targets.

Rick Williams Glen Haven, N.S.


This seems like madness. “Net-zero emissions” might as well mean “phasing out the oil sands.” Alberta and Western Canada’s economy is largely resource-based. With proper management, these industries could actually help reduce global greenhouse-gas emissions.

Mike Priaro Calgary

Story continues below advertisement


It’s surely not entirely honest to reduce the environmental effects of projects such as the Teck Frontier mine or the Trans Mountain pipeline to greenhouse gas emissions in Canada alone.

A true assessment of emissions should include those from consuming the products they produce and transport, wherever in the world they occur. We share our planetary atmosphere. It would be hypocrisy to boast about Canada meeting targets when we are profiting by enabling them to be missed elsewhere.

Julie Beddoes Toronto


Re Teck CEO Warns Frontier Mine May Not Be Built Even If Approved (Report on Business, Jan. 30): On reading Don Lindsay’s warning about the Teck Frontier mine, I was reminded of Kinder Morgan’s announcement, nearly two years ago, that it was ready to walk away from the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion project.

For Teck Frontier to proceed, Mr. Lindsay says “we need three Ps” – pipeline (to be completed), price (of oil to go back up) and a partner. When Kinder Morgan threatened to quit the Trans Mountain project, the Trudeau government ended up buying the pipeline. With so much political skin in the game, can our Prime Minister afford not to throw more taxpayer billions at the mine that’s needed to fill the pipe? Or will Canada cut its losses, I hope, on the damaging sunset industry that is Canadian bitumen?

Gordon Cornwall North Vancouver

Story continues below advertisement


Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

In the interests of public health and safety, our coronavirus news articles are free for anyone to access. However, The Globe depends on subscription revenue to support our journalism. If you are able, please subscribe to globeandmail.com. If you are already a subscriber, thank you for your support.

Your subscription helps The Globe and Mail provide readers with critical news at a critical time. Thank you for your continued support. We also hope you will share important coronavirus news articles with your friends and family. In the interest of public health and safety, all our coronavirus news articles are free for anyone to access.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies