Skip to main content

Letters to the Editor May 16: Ban single-use plastics. Plus other letters to the editor

Eldar Emric/The Associated Press

Letters to the Editor should be exclusive to The Globe and Mail. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. Try to keep letters to fewer than 150 words. Letters may be edited for length and clarity. To submit a letter by e-mail, click here: letters@globeandmail.com

..................................................................................................................................

Ban single-use plastics

Re Scrap Heap: Canada’s Recycling Industry In Crisis Mode (Folio, May 15): Waste management businesses are struggling to process their subpar plastics, and governments are left holding the proverbial bag without overseas buyers for our unwanted, so-called renewables. Municipalities are struggling with curbside recycling programs, just as citizens, more often than not, are faced with having to buy products that come in non-recyclable materials.

Story continues below advertisement

Rather than dealing with the fallout, we need to ban single-use plastics at the source. And don’t tell me that it will hobble the food and consumer-goods industries. People aren’t going to stop eating. As long as there is a buyer at the end of the line, the market will find a way.

Jayson MacLean, Ottawa

Conveniently absent?

Re MPs Apologize To Norman For Impact Of Failed Prosecution (May 15): It was very impressive to see members of the House of Commons, in a rare display of unanimity, vote to recognize Vice-Admiral Mark Norman for decades of loyal service to Canada, express regret and apologize for the personal and professional hardship he and his family endured. What was not so impressive was that both Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan left the House before the vote was taken, each to deal with a “previously scheduled” engagement.

Barry Francis, Toronto

Climate censure

Referring to Donald Trump and friends, Lawrence Martin writes that “The accruing gravity of the climate-change issue is becoming apparent to all but the most resolute troglodytes” (Trump’s Shambolic Foreign Policy Risks Tempting Him Into War – May 15).

And yet, on the very same page as Mr. Martin’s column – and writing as Ontario directors of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation – Christine van Geyn and Jasmine Picket commend Doug Ford’s fight against the carbon tax (Ford Is Wise To Fight The Carbon Tax. But He Shouldn’t Use Taxpayer Money On Ads – May 15).

They do not mention that the latter’s net cost is minimal, while the cost of climate change for the taxpayers they claim to represent is becoming huge.

Story continues below advertisement

Jean Daudelin, associate professor, Norman Paterson School of International Affairs, Carleton University

...........................

My husband and I have been taxpayers for more than 40 years, and the Canadian Taxpayers Federation does not speak for us. We are among the large majority of Canadians – 83 per cent, according to a recent Abacus poll – who are either “quite,” “very” or “extremely” concerned about climate change. We support governments at any level that take firm climate actions, that move our economy toward a low-carbon future, and that can offer our kids a chance at a livable planet.

Ellen Schwartzel, Toronto

...........................

The Ontario election wasn’t a referendum on the carbon tax. It was a consensus to kick out Kathleen Wynne. Ontario understands that we must address the climate crisis, and I expect this fall’s federal election will make that clear.

Story continues below advertisement

Alex Cameron, Mimico, Ont.

5 cents’ worth …

Re Doug Ford’s Feel-Bad Movie Of The Summer (editorial, May 14): The Ford government’s attacks on the carbon tax in its One Little Nickel spot on TV have one baffling element. The “cash flow” runs in the opposite direction compared to most other taxes.

The gas pump is not sucking up nickels, it is spewing them out at such a force that they fall all over the floor. Similarly, the fruit in the grocery store is shedding nickels, the canned goods are spewing nickels and the heating vent is gushing out nickels. Maybe this is all a subtle message to support the carbon tax?

Maybe Mr. Ford is a sort of “Manchurian candidate,” who actually has a secret environmentally friendly agenda. Maybe all those nickels are a metaphor for the annual rebate from the federal carbon tax that will actually leave most families better off at the end of the year.

Michael Greason, Toronto

...........................

Story continues below advertisement

Nickels, nickels, and more nickels spill to the ground in this big-budget, anti-carbon tax extravaganza – Doug Ford, producer. Upward of 600 million taxpayers’ nickels are being spent to further a partisan agenda, to dissuade Ontarians from the best economic tool for curbing carbon emissions. This production, in whatever way you cost it, is well over budget.

James Schaefer, Peterborough, Ont.

...........................

Hmm, is this business with nickels pouring out actually subliminal messaging of slot machines paying out? I won’t be surprised if some of this footage gets reworked into advertising for a Ford Nation casino at Ontario Place.

Ian Kamm, Toronto

Dirty money’s source

Re How Bad Is Our Money-Laundering Problem? (May 15): Isn’t the more important problem where this dirty money is coming from in the first place? Wouldn’t we be better off tackling the problem at its source?

Story continues below advertisement

It seems to me that policing money-laundering operations is one great game of Whac-A-Mole. The ways to launder dirty money are practically limitless. Shut down the casino route and another method pops up immediately. (Remember the car wash on Breaking Bad?)

Dirty money is reported to be mostly from the illegal drug trade, gambling, extortion and insider trading. In my view, the first two are the major contributors. There is an effective solution to both: Legalize drugs and all gambling. It is not a panacea, but it would reduce the money-laundering problem significantly.

Patrick Tighe, Petawawa, Ont.

Salary: zero

Re Faculty Groups Seek Legal Aid In Response To Ontario Plan To Cut Salaries Of Elderly Professors Drawing Pensions (May 15): The Ford government claims that faculty renewal is the purpose of its plan to cut to zero the salaries of older professors who are legally required to draw their pensions.

If this is truly the government’s intent, the forthcoming regulations should require each defunded position to be matched with a tenure-track opening for a new faculty member. Otherwise, the government could be suspected of fomenting resentment against senior employees in order to justify further cuts to the Ontario professoriate.

Naomi Goldenberg, professor, University of Ottawa

Story continues below advertisement

#Selfabsorbed

Re #Nomore (May 15): Jennifer Hulley’s First Person essay confirms my feeling that there are many people in the world who are so shallow, they couldn’t drown in themselves. I am very glad I saw Paris several times before the explosion of selfie-taking tourists began faking their way around the City of Lights.

Kevin Byrne, Bright’s Grove, Ont.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter