Skip to main content

Bird habitat is a continent-wide concern – and must be preserved.

Jeff Nadler/Pew Environment Group

One of the joys of having a garden, or of walking in a park or down almost any tree-lined street in North America, is the sight and sound of our songbirds. For many of us, their chorus beats virtual tweeting any day. But in recent years, these birds have become increasingly harder to hear.

Drawing on 40 years of data, the authors at the North American Bird Conservation Initiative show in a first-ever, comprehensive study (State of Canada's Birds) that a number of Canada's favourite species are in trouble, and many more soon will be. In total, 44 per cent of all Canadian birds are in decline. The cause: disappearing habitat combined with climate change, both at home and abroad.

The news is as alarming to me, an American birder living in Maine, as it would be to any Canadian. Many of the species that pass through my backyard are coming from or heading to Canada. After all, the Canadian boreal forest is North America's bird nursery, exploding with 3-billion to 5-billion migrants on their way south each fall.

Story continues below advertisement

The problem is not just Canada's, of course. Since the birds don't recognize international borders, protecting the habitats on which these birds depend during their migrations takes continentwide efforts. If we are to reverse their decline, Canadian and U.S. governments and conservation groups need to collaborate.

As State of Canada's Birds notes, cross-border co-operation works. Indeed, in the case of ducks and geese, North American waterfowl programs and conservation measures have already helped increase populations.

The Canadian government in 2007 established the Natural Areas Conservation Program and provided $225-million to help nongovernmental organizations secure ecologically sensitive lands. The fund is led by The Nature Conservancy of Canada with assistance from another non-profit, Ducks Unlimited Canada. In order to encourage donations, the government matches funds raised by U.S. or Canadian groups.

The U.S. government has a long history of supporting Canadian bird conservation, including $422-million for Canadian wetland conservation efforts under the North American Waterfowl Management Plan. Other U.S. sources contributed $430-million to Canadian wetland preservation efforts, including $59-million from state governments.

Since 1986, these initiatives have safeguarded roughly 10-million acres and influenced management on more than 30-million acres of wetland habitat vital to birds across Canada. A recent commitment between Ducks Unlimited and the U.S.-based Pew Charitable Trusts to 10 more years of boreal forest conservation work confirms we have willing partners, both private and public, when it comes to protecting the birds we all share.

There is reason to feel positive about the future of our shared avian friends. Actions such as Quebec's Plan Nord, which would strictly protect a boreal region the size of France from industrial development, and conservation partnerships with native groups in B.C., Ontario, Manitoba, the Northwest Territories and Labrador, are all encouraging.

If we can extend our concern and efforts to songbirds and their vital Canadian boreal forest home, we can give them a fighting chance. Our songbirds aren't canaries, but how they fare in the future will be a test of the health of the environment on which we all depend, and of the commitment on both sides of the border to protect them. Let nature's twittering thrive.

Story continues below advertisement

Jeff Wells, an ornithologist and conservation biologist, is a science adviser to the Pew Environment Group's Canadian boreal protection campaign.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies