Skip to main content

Benjamin Dachis is a senior policy analyst at the C.D. Howe Institute

The Advisory Council on Government Assets, led by Ed Clark, announced this week that big changes are in store for the province's beer sales and electricity system. Although much public attention has been on the locally novel idea of allowing beer sales in grocery stores, the biggest potential consequence of the Clark report is to enable cities to sell their electricity assets.

The main money maker for the province, in the current plan, is selling a majority interest in its Hydro One transmission and distribution business. That would bring in $5-billion to pay down provincial debt, and a further $4-billion earmarked for infrastructure investments.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Clark recommended that the province go further still. Starting in January, the province could temporarily remove an onerous tax that makes it difficult for cities to bring in private capital for electricity investment. The existing tax bite is up to one-third of the value of any purchase of a municipal utility. The tax is so high that sales don't happen.

Removing that barrier would kick-start privately led consolidation of municipally owned distributors.

The key deal to watch, recommended in the report, would merge the Brampton arm of Hydro One with the electricity distributors owned by the cities of Hamilton, St. Catharines, Mississauga, Barrie, Markham and Vaughan. The province's stake in that entity would be 17 per cent, valued at about $600-million. That puts an overall value of the newly merged operation at about $3.6-billion.

Once the tax changes are in place, the next step would be for those municipalities to decide if they would rather sell their stakes in the new company or hold onto them. Combined, the cities would earn about $3-billion from a sale, given Mr. Clark's valuation.

Over the course of their remaining terms in office, municipal councils across the province that still own electricity assets will need to make the same decision.

As of 2013, there were 73 local electricity distributors operating across the province. Most are owned by municipalities. They range in size from tiny Hydro 2000 outside of Ottawa, with barely more than 1,000 customers, to the behemoth Toronto Hydro.

According to 2013 data from the Ontario Energy Board, municipal governments in Ontario were sitting on about $14-billion worth of distribution property and equipment. Collectively, cities owned about 60 per cent of total electricity distribution assets in Ontario, with the province's Hydro One assets representing the rest. The change in the tax rules opens up the ability for cities to sell their electricity assets without paying a tax; $14-billion can buy a lot of new transit lines or buses, or pay down debt.

Story continues below advertisement

End-delivery charges are now over one-third of the total bill for a typical residential customer. So getting distribution policy right matters.

While raising money is important, so too is keeping the cost of electricity down. Merging the smallest of operations would likely mean lower operating costs. But as public sector companies grow, mergers with other, large operations will be less likely to result in savings. Mergers led with private capital could bring cost discipline that would keep costs lower than otherwise.

Municipal governments don't need to own distribution companies to keep costs down. The Ontario Energy Board keeps a close regulatory eye on all price changes regardless of who owns the companies. Mr. Clark summed up worries of provincial ownership of regulated electricity assets as "adding a belt when already wearing suspenders." The same applies to cities.

The province's moves to sell its electricity assets will provide funds labelled for infrastructure. It's now time that cities across the province take a close look at their electricity assets too.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies