Skip to main content

Jennifer Keesmaat, chief planner at the City of Toronto

While some may argue that the issues Toronto faces as a city are insurmountable, and therefore planning is an impossible task, I believe this is the best possible moment, both locally and nationally, to engage in city building and taking ownership of our shared future.

This is the moment because most Canadians now live in urban places. The absence of national strategies related to the development of transit infrastructure and affordable housing affects us all. Canadians are shortchanged by the lack of national policy, investment and leadership that could address these oversights.

Much of what we need to do is already being done elsewhere, and national governments are playing a pivotal role in urban development in countries across the world. Canada, for example, is the only country in the G8 without a national transit strategy.

Story continues below advertisement

Furthermore, there are some serious conversations we need to have about how our cities will evolve. We need to move away from rhetoric and use data to find insight that will inform these conversations, shape our policy and position us as leaders of best practices.

This is also the moment because well-planned cities provide healthy places for diverse members of our society to thrive, including new Canadians. In Toronto, there's a clear and distinct geography that tells the story of growing income disparity between the rich and the poor. Bridging this gap demands special planning efforts focused on attracting private- and public-sector investment to areas in need of physical revitalization.

Affordable, quality housing and access to excellent public transit are minimum requirements for moving out of poverty and into the middle class. Also important are strategic investments in social and community development programs and job-creation opportunities similar to the models now under way in Regent Park.

Cities are emerging on a global scale as strategic places for innovation, which is a key driver of economic recovery. Continuing to attract talent drives this innovation. Creating great places to live – which includes investing in the buildings and spaces we share in common – is imperative in ensuring that people seek out our cities as places to learn, visit and raise families. Our economy needs our cities to be places of beauty and inspiration.

The passion Canadians have for their cities is palpable. But so is the frustration, and the sense that we continue to miss the mark. We need new planning paradigms that entwine our cities and regions, we need clarity about what it will cost to make the public infrastructure investments that we require, and we need to embrace new, creative financing models.

In Live Where You Go, the recently released report prepared by the Pembina Institute and the Royal Bank, residents in Ontario and elsewhere increasingly say they would give up a large house and yard and a long car commute in favour of homes that are a convenient distance from workplaces, amenities and rapid transit.

Our suburbs – often the least walkable parts of the city fabric with the most underutilized public infrastructure – must evolve to be responsive to this emerging desire. This is the moment when planning differently – sustainably, with a comprehensive view of how land-use patterns affect long-term infrastructure costs – could be embraced across the political spectrum.

Story continues below advertisement

Changing how we plan will not be easy, although our future depends on it. We're going to need to take some risks. And we need all hands on deck.

After all, this is the perfect moment to do it.

Jennifer Keesmaat is the City of Toronto's new chief planner.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.