Skip to main content

Opinion Putin’s ‘mission accomplished’ moment in Syria was all for show

Bessma Momani is professor at the Balsillie School of International Affairs and the University of Waterloo. She is also a senior fellow at the Centre for International Governance and Innovation

Russia's President Vladimir Putin made an unexpected trip to Syria on Monday to announce the removal of some of his troops from the war-torn Middle Eastern country. If this feels like déjà vu, you are not imagining it. Mr. Putin has made similar announcements twice before, and at one point was forced to renege and redeploy Russian forces after Syria's Bashar al-Assad lost control of territory they had helped win over. But Mr. Putin did not go to Syria to shore up Mr. al-Assad's flailing legitimacy; he went to Syria to dupe a Russian audience.

Needless to say, before Russia's two year aerial bombardment supporting Syrian, Hezbollah, and Iranian ground forces, Mr. al-Assad's regime was undoubtedly in jeopardy. Hence, Mr. al-Assad's warm embrace of Mr. Putin on the tarmac of Russia's Hmeymim air base in Syria was that of a man thankful for his very survival. Russia's entrance into the Syrian war to prop up Mr. al-Assad would put an end to American wrangling about whether U.S. President Barack Obama should intervene in the Syrian conflict to stop the bloodshed and outpouring stream of refugees. The costs of intervention would now be too high for Mr. Obama and the benefits uncertain as ever.

Story continues below advertisement

On the heels of a popular occupation of Eastern Ukraine done in the name of "protecting" Russian-speaking communities, Mr. Putin would use the Syrian intervention to restore a bruised image of Russia as a global superpower. This despite the fact that Russia is, by all accounts, a declining economic power controlled by crony capitalists that suck the riches from a petro-state characterized by low productivity and innovation. As astute Kremlin watchers note, Mr. Putin need not fill the fridge of an average Russian if he can control the TV to fill them with nationalist pride.

Mr. Putin's showboating in Syria serves to create more hollow nationalism for the Russian public's consumption. It is not a coincidence that Mr. Putin's claim of victory in Syria comes as the international coalition is declaring the end of ISIS's self-proclaimed caliphate. Mr. Putin would like his people to believe his forces were in Syria to fight the ISIS terrorist network, which had seized nearly a third of Syrian territory. With the exception of Russia's liberation of Palmyra from ISIS, Russian forces were more likely helping to prop up the al-Assad regime, guilty of killing nearly 200,000 of its own civilians, than engaging in any fight against ISIS.

ISIS was defeated thanks to predominantly Kurdish-Syrian forces in the East and Turkish-backed forces in the North. Across the border, the Iraqi army, Iranian-backed militia, and Kurdish Peshmerga forces cleared ISIS from its Iraqi territories. Across the Syrian and Iraqi landscape, it was Western governments' air power that supported the ground forces who liberated territory from ISIS's grip. Russian media will skirt over these details and Mr. Putin will no doubt try to take credit for the defeat of ISIS.

The timing of Mr. Putin's visit to Syria is also about domestic politics. A few days earlier, he stood in front of an automobile factory and responded to a staged question about whether he would run for another term as President. The sly Putin announced that he would indeed run again in the March election. His eventual victory is not in doubt; he controls nearly 80 per cent of Russian media, critical journalists have been mysteriously killed, and his alpha male image as a leader who resurrected Russia's image as a global superpower makes him extremely popular. If, or safe to say, when Mr. Putin wins the 2018 election, he will govern until 2024, a reign nearly as long as Joseph Stalin's.

Despite the optics, we are not one step closer to peace in Syria, because the country is run by hundreds of warlords and militias. The al-Assad regime controls Damascus, but he emboldened and then bequeathed power to thugs and warlords who govern outside the capital. The Syrian opposition, both armed and unarmed, have been pacified for now.

Despite announcing the pulling of some troops, Mr. Putin affirmed that Russia's air and naval base will remain steadfast in Syria. Dependency on oil exports in an age of stagnant oil prices means Russians will need further television coverage of Mr. Putin's global gambits to fill the void of economic prosperity. Good thing Mr. Putin will hold his marathon four-hour diatribe on Russian TV this Thursday.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter