Skip to main content

Being a good Samaritan has its risks. People who rush to another's aid in a crisis often put themselves in harm's way. It is in their nature to do the right thing on instinct. Tragically, as we have seen in many cases -- swimmers drowning while rescuing a friend, people dying in house fires after returning to save others -- their selfless acts may cost them their lives.

Last Saturday morning, Rachel Davis was shot while trying to protect a stranger. Ms. Davis, 23, was leaving a Vancouver club with several friends at 4 a.m. when they came upon a fight between two groups. Members of one group began kicking a man in the other group as he lay on the ground. Ms. Davis ran to the unconscious man and used her body as a shield to protect him. Somebody pulled a gun; shots were fired. At the end of it, Ms. Davis's friends found her dying of a shot to the head. The gunman had fled. Several other people were injured, one fatally.

Beyond her senseless killing, beyond yet another disturbing instance of guns fired on Canadian streets, is the compassion Ms. Davis showed in trying to protect another human in trouble. As her father said later, it is important that she be recognized as more than someone caught in a crossfire. She made a decision not to ig-nore a beating, not to consider it someone else's problem, not to look the other way.

Story continues below advertisement

Some might see the message of her death as a negative: that it is foolhardy to stick one's neck out when confronted with a street fight, because someone might have a gun and use it. To our mind, the message is otherwise, and inspiring: that there are still people who care enough not to stand by while someone is being kicked into unconsciousness. Rachel Davis was such a person.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies