Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

The test of your democratic values, if you live in the Middle East today, comes when a majority of your fellow citizens elect a party whose ambitions are opposed to those very values. Do you support an effort to cut the party off at the root, defying the election result? Or do you let the party's ideas wither on the vine under the heat of political reality, and wait for the inevitable democratic defeat?

This week, we witnessed a historic illustration of these contrasting approaches. Two national leaders, both elected Islamists who ruled increasingly recklessly, each suffered major setbacks.

The less subtle one happened to Mohamed Morsi of Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood: On Tuesday, a Cairo court upheld his sentence to death by hanging.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Morsi is the only person ever to become president of Egypt in a free and fairly contested election. He won power in June, 2012, by a slim majority against a disorganized secular opposition. His rule was chaotic, ham-fisted and demagogic: He locked up journalists and cracked down violently on protests, tried to impose harsh religious laws, and bypassed democratic checks and balances in a paranoid attempt to consolidate power.

By 2013, it was apparent that Mr. Morsi's government was a disaster, betraying the principles of the 2011 democratic revolution that brought him to power. It was also apparent that the majority of the Egyptian electorate was appalled by his rule.

But that failure was not allowed to manifest itself, and the wider Mideast did not get to witness an Islamist government losing an election and fading into obscurity: On July 3, 2013, he was overthrown in a military coup led by General Abdel Fatteh el-Sisi, who remains president today and whose regime has killed at least 2,500 Muslim Brotherhood members and imprisoned 16,000.

The rest have mainly fled the country – and become more potent and extreme. As New York University Mideast analyst Mohamat Bazzi recently concluded, executing Mr. Morsi "would make him a martyr in Egypt and beyond" and send the message that "the only way to achieve political power is through violence."

When leaders with bad ideas are popularly elected, overthrowing or killing them has two effects. First, the thing that replaces them is almost bound to be even worse. And second, instead of fading into ignominious obscurity after an election loss, they become the subjects of heroic mythology.

That happened throughout the last century. Elected leaders with lousy economic ideas, such as Mohammad Mosaddeq in Iran, Salvador Allende in Chile or João Goulart in Brazil, all of whom would have been forgotten soon after their one-term electoral demise, were overthrown in military-backed (and U.S.-backed) coups; their imposed, non-democratic successors were terrible tyrants who badly damaged their countries.

But there is another approach. Islamists can burn out, but they can also fade away.

Story continues below advertisement

The second Islamist leader to suffer a setback this week was President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey. His was less violent, but more historically significant: After 60 per cent of Turks voted for anyone but Mr. Erdogan's party in last week's elections, he emerged from four days of silence this week to declare that his Justice and Development Party would need to govern in a compromise with other parties which oppose his agenda, and, by implication, would abandon his plan to rewrite the constitution to become an all-powerful executive.

This was quite a denouement for a man who has recently portrayed himself as a revival of the Ottoman Sultanate. While he started in 2002 as a European-minded reformist moderate, first as Prime Minister and then as President, in recent years he has imprisoned scores of journalists, cracked down violently on protests and changed the constitution to give himself great power. Historically, that would be occasion for a military coup in Turkey.

But the military and Mr. Erdogan's opponents allowed his narrative to play out. And this changed the views of Turks: They came overwhelmingly to prefer democracy over strongman leadership, Europe over the Mideast, and secularism over Islam. Polls show that support for sharia law is only 12 per cent, the lowest in any Muslim country; Mr. Erdogan's support fell by 24 per cent and support for religious leaders fell by 27 per cent. The Islamist experience turned Turks against the Islamist experience, and encouraged more robust democracy. Mr. Erdogan will either change to embrace these views, or suffer even greater electoral losses. This is how the world of religious politics should end: Not with an autocratic bang but with a democratic whimper.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies