Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

This article was originally published in April of 2016.

Let's talk about the $6.6-million man.

During a press conference on Friday, Dr. Eric Hoskins, Ontario's Health Minister, revealed that more than 500 of Ontario's 33,000 doctors bill the provincial health insurance program more than $1-million, including one ophthalmologist who billed an eye-popping $6.6-million.

Story continues below advertisement

The reaction to that revelation was fascinating and telling.

There was incredulity – doubt expressed that it was physically possible for a single practitioner to perform $18,000 worth of procedures daily, the equivalent of about 40 cataract operations a day for 365 days a year.

Current privacy legislation does not allow the physician's name or the details of his practice to be revealed, so there was more speculation than actual information. (British Columbia and Manitoba publish individual billing data, but other provinces do not.)

There were those who said if the billing was not fraudulent (and there is no suggestion it was), then the minister has no business complaining about the cost of services rendered. The province does not have a hard cap on billings, but it does roll back fees a bit for high billers (those over $1-million), which some interpret as punishing productivity.

There were, of course, the usual reminders that billings are not income, they include overhead; but even if overhead was 95 per cent (which is unlikely), the $6.6-million man would still clear $330,000.

Then there were those who expressed outrage that the minister would actually speak out publicly, and mildly rebuke some doctors to boot. Apparently, during a contract dispute, one side should be free to say anything – up to and including calling on Dr. Hoskins to resign – but the minister should remain silent.

There is no question Dr. Hoskins was trying to get a rise out of the medical profession. It was not a coincidence the press conference took place on the eve of a demonstration – the first time Ontario doctors have taken to the streets since 1986. Ontario's doctors have been without a contract for two years, and there haven't even been formal talks for more than a year. Both sides are trying to win the public over to their side. That's how negotiations and politics work.

Story continues below advertisement

What's unfortunate is that amidst the screaming, the actual positions of the Ontario Medical Association and the provincial government have been lost.

While the newspaper stories zeroed in on the $6.6-million biller, Dr. Hoskins's underlying point – that there are gross disparities and unfairness in how different physicians are paid – was largely lost.

This issue, relativity, is complex, but can be illustrated with a simple question: If a family doctor and an eye doctor are equally important, why is the latter paid markedly more?

The underlying problem is the fee-for-service model. The fee schedule – a list of 7,300 medical acts that doctors can bill for – reveals that technical and surgical interventions tend to be well-remunerated, while actually speaking to patients doesn't pay.

So, for example, the fee for a 15-minute cataract surgery, about $500, is about the same as what a doctor would get for more than three hours of psychological counselling.

The OMA, like a union should, wants its members' fees/income to increase across the board, so it is not that interested in tackling a divisive issue like relativity.

Story continues below advertisement

The OMA has now bet all its marbles on binding arbitration. Dr. Hoskins says he is willing to talk about it – but only at the negotiating table. The problem with binding arbitration is that while it will resolve a short-term monetary dispute, it will perpetuate the current flawed physician payment model.

As many have noted, there needs to be a fundamental rethink of how doctors are paid – not a reduction in overall fees, but a recalibration. That has to be negotiated and implemented over time.

Nobody is benefiting from the current stalemate. Doctors have had their fees unilaterally cut back – hurting the least well paid the hardest – and they are rightly bitter. The province wants to undertake broader health reforms and it needs doctors onside and engaged.

In the grand scheme of things – $11.8-billion in physician payments in Ontario alone – a $6.6-million man is an anomalous irrelevancy, but it's also a symbol of how we've lost our way in the quest to pay valued doctors properly.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies