Skip to main content
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
Get full digital access to globeandmail.com
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
// //

Frank Ching is a Hong Kong-based journalist.

----------------------------------

The consternation in Hong Kong about the case of five missing booksellers – especially the most recent case of the apparent disappearance of Lee Bo, feared to have been kidnapped and smuggled into the Chinese mainland – shows that the chief concern of the local population has not changed since before the handover in 1997. That is to ensure that their personal security, guaranteed under British colonial rule, will continue after China resumed sovereignty.

Story continues below advertisement

The fear of the loss of rights and freedoms, rather than a consuming desire for democracy, was what drove 10 per cent of the Hong Kong populace to seek refuge abroad before 1997. The apparent continuation of such freedoms lured many of them to return, albeit with a foreign passport as an insurance policy so that, if need be, they could again go abroad.

However, the case of Mr. Lee and four other men linked to a Hong Kong publishing company and bookstore suggests that now, 18 years after China resumed sovereignty over Hong Kong under the "one country, two systems" formula, Hong Kongers' rights and freedoms, while still guaranteed by the Basic Law, may be subject to violation.

It is unclear if the violations have the approval of the central authorities. Lower-level Chinese officials may not fully understand central government policy on Hong Kong, given the twists and turns of recent years.

After all, 20 years ago, the emphasis clearly was on "two systems." Now, the emphasis is on "one country," which, we are told, is the precondition for "two systems." Given this drastic change, it is entirely possible that security officials in Guangdong province, which adjoins Hong Kong, may think they have a green light to take actions in the special administrative region, which, after all, is an integral part of the "one country."

Given that the highest priority of the Chinese government is to ensure the Communist Party remains in power, any perceived threat to the party, such as mainlanders buying banned books in Hong Kong or taking part in anti-Communist demonstrations, may well be seen as justifying action within Hong Kong to protect the party's monopoly on power.

The dispute about cross-system interference goes back to the late 1980s, even before the establishment of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, when party secretary Jiang Zemin proposed that "well water does not intrude into river water."

Mr. Jiang explained that China would not impose socialism on Hong Kong, and the latter should not try to instill capitalist ways into the mainland. This was said after the Tiananmen Square crackdown, when many in Hong Kong called for the overthrow of the Communist Party.

Story continues below advertisement

It is likely that as long as the impact of Hong Kong's rights – such as freedom of the press, freedom of speech and freedom of assembly – are confined to the former British colony, Beijing will not feel too threatened. But when they spill over into the mainland, it is a different story.

Thus, Beijing has tolerated massive annual July 1 rallies marking the 1997 handover; in recent years, some mainlanders have taken part in such activities as well and it is known that a number of such people were arrested after their return home. Similarly, Chinese customs officials try to keep books and newspapers published in Hong Kong out of the mainland.

Worth noting is that Global Times, the Beijing newspaper affiliated with the official People's Daily, pointed out that Causeway Bay Books, the bookstore involved, had "to a large extent, targeted at the mainland" and "undercut the foundation of the mainland's rule of law system." Thus, Global Times argued, it is "reasonable and legal" for mainland authorities to launch an investigation into the bookstore.

This suggests the influence of Hong Kong books in the mainland is considerable and has caused the authorities there much concern. In Mr. Jiang's words, the well water of Hong Kong has intruded into the mainland's river water.

The popularity of Hong Kong books with mainland visitors is seen as a problem in Beijing. But it is a problem that must be resolved in the mainland, possibly with the Communist Party opening up and making more information available so that its people won't feel a need to seek uncensored information in Hong Kong. Alternatively, Beijing may seek to tighten controls further on the mainland.

Whatever means Beijing adopts to control its own people, it must not entail mainland officials operating in Hong Kong and violating the stated policy of "one country, two systems," which China had solemnly pledged to uphold in the United Nations more than three decades ago. The world is watching to see whether Beijing keeps its promises.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies