Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

I'll forgive you if you haven't been paying attention to the New Democratic leadership race. It's been about as thrilling as watching paint dry. This suits a lot of Dippers, who believe in consensus and kumbaya, unlike those fratricidal Liberals, who are always tearing each other to shreds in their ruthless quest for power. NDPers are morally and spiritually better than that.

But now, New Democrats might be ready to select a mean guy. Thomas Mulcair's main claim to fame is that he is a pit bull. Some people think this is a good thing, because only a pit bull is mean and nasty enough to take on Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

NDPers must be nostalgic for St. Jack. He was always smiling and his brand of socialism wasn't very scary. He was a happy warrior. Now they've got to choose between an angry warrior and a crowd of wimps. Decent people they may be, but there's not enough charisma among the lot of them to power an environmentally friendly light bulb.

Story continues below advertisement

The other point in Mr. Mulcair's favour is geography. He's from Quebec. So are a majority of the party's seats. Maybe he can persuade Quebeckers that even though le bon Jack is gone, his party is worth more than a one-night stand. The way to do this is by promising them everything they want, forever. And if Quebeckers don't like the way things are going, no problem! They can leave.

Within the party, the rap against Mr. Mulcair is that he believes in "modernizing." This seems to mean he might try to move the party to the centre to win more popular support. There are rumours that he might even talk to the Liberals. "Modernizing" is a dirty word to many Dippers, who, unlike Liberals, prefer purity to power. The old guard thoroughly despise him. Even Ed Broadbent has been trash-talking him.

The trouble is, the world has changed a lot since Mr. Broadbent led his party to a (then) record 43 seats back in 1988. The socialists, and their ideas, fell out of power across Europe. The NDP's old base of well-paid union workers shrank dramatically – they now account for just 16 per cent of Canadians working in the private sector. The public-sector unions can expect dwindling support from the rest of the country as they fight to defend their privileges, which look pretty good compared to most people's. Our most pressing public-policy challenge is health care, which is straining at the seams because of soaring costs and unquenchable demand. Jobs for kids are drying up. The NDP has nothing to say about all this, except "tax the rich."

"We've always been very conscious of the fact that a majority of Canadians share most of our goals and values," Mr. Mulcair said the other day. But they don't. Take the oil sands. Most Canadians (except Quebeckers) want the oil sands developed in a responsible way because they think the economic benefits outweigh the drawbacks. Most NDPers want the oil left in the ground because they think the oil sands are immoral. Mr. Mulcair claims he's not against the oil sands (which he calls "tar sands") so long as the government extracts billions from the industry in the process. Westerners will go for that the day the Maple Leafs win the Stanley Cup.

Some NDPers are under the illusion that after the miracle of 2011, they actually have a shot at power. This is a fantasy. They stumbled into Official Opposition because Quebeckers loved Jack Layton and the Liberals fell apart. This confluence of circumstances will never be repeated. Today's progressives are in the same position conservatives were in 1993, only worse. It took only a few years for warring members of the right to overcome their distaste for each other and start talking about uniting again. The Liberals and New Democrats are far more tribal. Until they get over it, they don't have a chance. Otherwise, as the NDP's Pat Martin told The Hill Times last week, "Stephen Harper will be Prime Minister until he gets bored."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies