Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Cancel Anytime
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

After more than three years of accusations and counteraccusations, mountains of documents, 31 charges of fraud, bribery and breach of trust, 62 days of trial – along with fevered commentary about crimes and cover-ups and abuse of power extending to the highest office of the land – we wind up with this? Zip. Nada. Mike Duffy (and possibly his fellow senators) has been redeemed.

Surely the faction most crushed by the vindication of Mr. Duffy must be the news media. As they told it, democracy itself was under threat from Stephen Harper's nefarious Conservative government. But their hoped-for mountain of scandal turned out to be a molehill.

Mr. Duffy was no master fraud artist. He was nothing more than an unusually diligent hack, sent forth to do his master's bidding. He argued that he was only following the rules determined by the Senate itself, and the judge found that this was largely true. His expense claims for his residency were clearly ridiculous (because he clearly lived in Ottawa, not PEI). But it turns out that David Tkachuk, the Senate boss who controlled the rules, told him to make the claims. So whose fault was that?

Story continues below advertisement

I did think Mr. Duffy might be nailed for putting his personal trainer on contract. I thought that was a stretch. Ontario Court Justice Charles Vaillancourt did, too. "Unorthodox," he said. But not criminally illegal. From the start, Mr. Duffy's lawyer argued that these matters were administrative issues, not criminal ones. This is a reasonable defence, with which the judge agreed.

What's not in doubt is that the Harper government brought its troubles on itself. After the Senate came under fire for dubious expense practices – including those that were legal under the existing rules – Mr. Duffy's political bosses tried to throw him overboard. When he strenuously objected to this wretched ingratitude, the boss's fixers tried to shut him up and make him whole, whether he wanted them to or not. And that didn't work out so well, as we know.

The media who made so much of this sorry mess weren't really after Mr. Duffy's scalp, of course (although he did make an undeniably attractive target). They were after the prime minister and his loyal fixers. Tantalizingly, Mr. Duffy himself had even promised that he would rip the lid off a "monstrous fraud." But there was no fraud – just a bungled and ethically dubious effort by the PM's henchmen to manage their way out of a public relations disaster.

What, then, have we learned? We have learned that the Senate is not, after all, an independent chamber of sober second thought. Instead, it is a sinecure for partisan cronies and bagmen who take their marching orders from their political masters. Quelle surprise! And the prime minister surrounded himself not with disinterested bureaucrats, but with ruthless and partisan control freaks. (Ditto.)

This was one of those comfortingly Canadian scandals – much ado about not much at all. All of his contested expense claims (plus the contested claims of all the other senators put together) added up to a few hundred thousand dollars. How much did this trial cost in time and money? Don't ask.

Did the Duffy affair hurt the Conservatives? No doubt. Did it cost them the election? No. It was just one more barnacle on their hull. And now they're gone, so no more damage can be done.

You could argue that this whole tawdry tale had one good outcome – it gave a major boost to the cause of Senate reform. But did it, really? It doesn't change the fact that senators are unelected and unaccountable, but remain free to use their power in whatever way they choose. It doesn't matter if these senators are "independent." The entire institution is profoundly undemocratic.

Story continues below advertisement

As for the Old Duff, he always insisted he'd be vindicated. Everyone thought that was just big talk. But everyone was wrong. Now we'll have to listen to him crow.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies