Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Cancel Anytime
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](,dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Tony Keller is The Globe and Mail's editorial page editor.

If failure is a great teacher, then the fiasco known as the Union Pearson Express means that Ontario's Liberal government deserves immediate membership in Mensa.

On Tuesday, Queen's Park admitted that the UPX has so far been a bust, and offered up a new, less illogical business plan for Toronto's downtown-to-airport train, which has spent the past six months running nine-10ths empty. The train for the 1 per cent – yes, that really was its business plan, financed with half-a-billion taxpayer dollars – is being converted into public transit, which is what it should have been in the first place. This is progress.

Story continues below advertisement

There are a lot of lessons to be taken from this failure, for a lot of people – chief among them the government in Ottawa, many of whose senior officials used to work at Queen's Park.

The federal Liberals won office in large part on a promise to double infrastructure spending over the next 10 years, to $125-billion. The theory, which a growing number of economists support, is that sound infrastructure investments can deliver long-term benefits for the economy, increasing efficiency, raising productivity and improving everyone's quality of life.

It's an idea I strongly agree with – in theory. But out here in the messy real world, I have one nagging worry, and you should too. Governments are good at spending money, but they're not always good at spending it well. And unless infrastructure money is well spent, the notion of an economic boost doesn't compute. Instead, you're building subways to nowhere and trains for no one – a recurring motif in Toronto transit history.

More than a decade ago, Ontario's government decided that it would be a good idea if Toronto had a train between downtown and Pearson International Airport. The federal government was pushing the idea too. It sounded reasonable enough on paper, and the train tracks were already there. And so, after the private sector said it couldn't see the business case, the UPX magically ended up at the top of the priority transit plan for Queen's Park and it's not-at-all-arm's-length transit agency, Metrolinx.

But somehow, in a city desperately in need of more and better mass transit, the plan for the UPX was not focused on building a train to serve Torontonians, and not on carrying commuters. Instead, it was about impressing occasional foreign visitors, particularly well-heeled ones. Metrolinx and the government somehow got it in their heads that what Toronto really needed was the Davos of trains.

Franz from Frankfurt, partner in an international consulting firm who flies to Toronto once a year, arriving rested after a night in the business cabin's lie-flat bed, was Metrolinx's fantasy date; sorry, fantasy passenger. They were a lot less interested in Sangeeta from Scarborough, who works at the airport and commutes there and back 500 times a year. And they were ‎actively hostile to Wendy from Weston, who commutes into the city every day, using a much slower route than the airport train. It was so important to get Franz downtown quickly and without contact with the hoi polloi that, in the initial plan, the UPX was to pass through Toronto's neighbourhoods without stopping. Why? Because World Class City, or something like that.

The UP Express even hired style guru Tyler Brûlé and his firm Winkreative to conjure up a look, feel and experience that, according to documents obtained last year by the Toronto Star, would "lure choice riders." There are greeters on the train and in the stations, sporting fashion-forward uniforms. The UPX has its own magazine, its own chief executive officer, layers of management, "executive quality seats" – and fewer riders than the Toronto Transit Commission's most underused bus routes.

Story continues below advertisement

There seems to have been an obsession with everything but the bothersome subject of actual, local customers, who pay taxes, vote in elections and take public transit, or would if it were available.

The provincial government deserves credit for this much: It failed, but at least it failed fast. It has now slashed fares on the UPX, to levels in line with the TTC and GO Train service. And at the two stations between the airport and downtown, riders will be encouraged to use the train as commuters. It is trying to turn the gold-plated train into public transit. Ridership will rise; it might even get overcrowded.

All of which would be a very good thing: If you're going to subsidize transit, isn't it better to subsidize a service used by a lot of people, rather than one serving next to nobody?

The challenge for government is that taxpayer money isn't an infinite resource. So when a government chooses to build a Sheppard subway that isn't needed, or a Scarborough subway that doesn't make economic sense, or take as its transit starting point a SmartTrack line that was drawn on the back of a napkin during an election campaign – welcome to transit planning in Toronto, circa forever – it is saying that other things, possibly more economically and socially beneficial infrastructure projects, will not be built.

In the pantheon of government misspending, the UP Express barely rates a mention. Half a billion dollars? Pfft. That's nothing. But a half billion here and a half billion there and pretty soon, you're talking real money. And pretty soon, there's none left.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies