Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

A few years ago, David Turpin and a couple of colleagues decided to look into an under-studied area of Canadian academia: the role of the university president.

What inspired Dr. Turpin, now president of the University of Alberta, and his collaborators was the growing sense that the number of school presidents being terminated by their boards of governors was on the rise. Their analysis ran from 1840 until 2011, and it showed that presidents were increasingly spending much less time in office than was historically the case.

The results were derived from two lists of data: One was provided by the Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada and included 102 university-accredited institutions across the country; the second was a much more select group used by Maclean's magazine in its annual rankings. It comprised 49 of the bigger, more high-profile schools.

Story continues below advertisement

Looking at the Maclean's list, the authors found that between 2006 and 2010, 12 presidents resigned their positions after having served less than three years in office; that compared to just four presidents in the preceding five-year period. The study observed that the number of presidents with relatively little experience (zero to two years) in the position was also growing.

In further examining the phenomenon of early departures, the authors considered an analysis of the same issue in the United States. That analysis suggested there were six common themes connected to most presidential breakdowns: ethical lapses, poor interpersonal skills, inability to lead key constituencies, difficulty to adapting to institutional culture, failure to meet business objectives and board shortcomings. It was noted that this all-encompassing list likely included the reasons many Canadian presidents were being fired or resigning early as well.

Dr. Turpin's study takes on fresh relevance in light of the debacle unfolding at the University of British Columbia, where Arvind Gupta resigned as president last summer after one year on the job.

His departure has blown up into a full-scale debacle, with Dr. Gupta this week breaking his silence about why he left. He said he felt compelled to defend himself after the school inadvertently released private 2015 e-mail correspondence between him and then-board chair John Montalbano – a chain of messages that revealed a litany of concerns the school's overseers had about their new president.

What seems clear now is that many in UBC's administrative ranks, including deans, were uncomfortable with the transformative agenda Dr. Gupta was intent on implementing.

What is also evident is that the new president, who had little university executive experience to draw upon, lacked the skills that are crucial when attempting to shatter the status quo and realign priorities at an institution as change-resistant as a university.

In his desire to do what he fervently believed was best for the student, Dr. Gupta was blinded to the angst his plan was inciting among powerful elements of the administration. In their study, Dr. Turpin and his colleagues discussed the skill set they believe a modern university president must possess.

Story continues below advertisement

"The role of the university president has shifted from that of primarily an academic leader to a position combining academic leadership and the responsibilities of leading a large, complex, multi-stakeholder business enterprise," the authors wrote.

They suggested that the president's job now resembles something closer to a chief executive officer. "As a result, university presidents now require professional management skills and experience in addition to those developed in their academic career."

(The analysis also noted that presidential search committees are large, often cumbersome bodies made up of a number of different constituencies but almost always lacking anyone with experience serving as a university president.)

It's clear Arvind Gupta lacked some of the skills fundamental to the arsenal of any modern-day president. Even he would likely admit that. But they are also ones he likely could have developed with the proper support. His lack of senior administrative experience was a critical factor in his demise; it wasn't so much that his vision was wrong, but rather that he was missing the deftness and political astuteness that is critical when attempting to usher in bold reform.

Ultimately, Dr. Gupta found himself in a high-stakes showdown with a board that held all the cards, in a game he was destined to lose. It seems to be a drama playing out with increasing frequency on campuses across the country.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies