Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Lyndon Johnson ruled his staff with a blazing personality and Texas-size loyalty oaths. He demanded that all his aides have, as he put it, "a passion for anonymity." He was the story, not them. It's an aphorism that applies just as much to being a political staffer today. But in our highly charged insider media world, when a political staffer starts becoming "the story," then trouble's usually not far behind.

For LBJ, it was a matter of credit. He wanted it all, from the biggest to the smallest. By contrast, the Senator Mike Duffy/Nigel Wright story will struggle to be an orphan; no one wants credit for this.

To the best of my knowledge, it's unique in Ottawa annals to have a prime minister's chief of staff insert himself so personally, as opposed to politically, to resolve a political problem. Indeed, it's inexplicable, which means just that: It defies explanation. A political staffer, the highest in the land, has now become the story.

Story continues below advertisement

Prime ministerial chiefs of staff have a role like no other. Personality and circumstances shape their tenure, for sure; but the essentials remain.

First, they serve at and for the pleasure of the prime minister, being his arm, advocate and adviser on any and all matters. They don't have to invoke the name of the prime minister when they call; they are the prime minister. If the Privy Council Office is the "department of the prime minister," the Prime Minister's Office, led by the chief of staff, is the prime minister.

Second, they're the linchpin between the two essential components of our political system: elected ministers and appointed public servants. The often differing goals and views of each need to be mobilized, assuaged and, ultimately, reconciled.

Third, they're the switchboard between the party and the government, connecting political circuits across the country to and from the apparatus of government. Staying in tune with supporters is the lifeblood of any PMO.

Finally, they're the political co-ordinating arm of all other political staff in all other offices. They set the tone and the direction for what others do and how they do it. Part Tony Robbins and part Darth Vader, you might say.

The closeness of a chief of staff to the PM is never assured, but it's a given. The system demands it. But prime ministers are bombarded with information every day; the most important commodity in any PMO is the PM's time. What the chief of staff knows may not always make it to the PM's desk, nor should it.

So where to draw the line between the personal and the political? The Senate expenses scandal certainly qualifies as political. What appears to have been a personal action by Mr. Wright, the Prime Minister's chief of staff, taken without the knowledge – we are told – of the Prime Minister, has morphed into a political action of significant and, as yet, unfinished consequences. In protecting the PM and his government, both are left more exposed, not less.

Story continues below advertisement

Part of the reason is the PMO's action itself in response to the breaking story. The first press statement started with the words "The government believes …" Since when do personal actions receive the imprimatur of the government of Canada? Those words have cast the mantle of responsibility wider than just one person making it look like a government-sanctioned enterprise. Shared anonymity and collective responsibility are becoming the story. A scandal across the street in the Senate has now been brought into the PMO.

LBJ had another saying about politics: "While you're saving your face, you're losing your ass."

David McLaughlin was chief of staff to former prime minister Brian Mulroney.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies